Aarseth, Espen, J. Cybertext: Perspective on Ergodic Literature (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1997).

Abruzzi, Ray, Luisa Calè, and Ana Parejo Vadillo, ‘Gale Digital Collections: Ray Abruzzi Interviewed by Luisa Calè and Ana Parejo Vadillo’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol. 21 (2015), p. none. <http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.753>.

Adema, Janneke, and Garry Hall, ‘Posthumanities: The Dark Side of “The Dark Side of the Digital”’, Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol. 19, no. 2 (Fall 2016), p. none. <http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0019.201>.

Alfano, Veronica, and Andrew Stauffer, eds., Virtual Victorians: Networks, Connections, Technologies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Allison, Sarah, Ryan Heuser, Matthew Jockers, Franco Moretti, and Michael Witmore, ‘Quantitative Formalism: An Experiment’, Stanford Literary Lab (2011), <https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet1.pdf> [accessed 12 September 2018].

Alvarado, Rafael, and Paul Humphreys, ‘Big Data, Thick Mediation, and Representational Opacity’, New Literary History, vol. 48, no. 4 (2017), pp. 729–49. <https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2017.0037>[accessed 12 September 2018].

Antonijević, Smiljana, Amongst Digital Humanists: An Ethnographic Study of Digital Knowledge Production (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Bartscherer, Thomas, and Roderick Coover, Switching Codes: Thinking Through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).

Battershill, Claire, et al., Scholarly Adventures in Digital Humanities: Making The Modernist Archives Publishing Project (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).

Berry, David, ed., Understanding Digital Humanities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).

Berry, David M., and Anders Fagerjord, Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age (Cambridge: Polity, 2017).

Bolter, Jay David, Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print (London: Routledge, 2001).

Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).

Booth, Alison, ‘Mid-Range Reading: Not a Manifesto’, PMLA, vol. 132, no. 3 (May 2017), pp. 620–27.

Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp, Digital Humanities (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).

Burnard, Lou, Katherine O'Brien O'Keeffe, and John Unsworth, eds., Electronic Textual Editing (New York: Modern Languages Association, 2005).

Buzzetti, Dino, Giuliano Pancaldi, and Harold Short, eds., Augmenting Comprehension: Digital Tools and the History of Ideas (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 2004).

Chernaik, Warren, Caroline Davis and Marilyn Deegan, eds., The Politics of the Electronic Text (1993; Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1997).

Chernaik, Warren, Marilyn Deegan and Andrew Gibson, eds., Beyond the Book: Theory, Culture, and the Politics of Cyberspace (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1996).

Chernaik, Warren, and Patrick Parrinder, eds., Textual Monopolies: Literary Copyright and the Public Domain (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1997).

Clement, Tanya E., ‘Text Analysis, Data Mining, and Visualizations in Literary Scholarship’, in Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology, 2013. <https://dlsanthology.mla.hcommons.org/text-analysis-data-mining-and-visualizations-in-literary-scholarship/> [accessed 13 September 2018].

Clement, Tanya E., ‘“A Thing Not Beginning and Not Ending”: Using Digital Tools to Distant-Read Gertrude Stein’s The Making of Americans’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 23, no. 3 (2008), pp. 361–81. <https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn020>.

Curry, Emma, and Ben Winyard, ‘Our Virtual Friends: Dickens, Digital Communities, and Performative Learning’, Victorian Periodicals Review, vol. 21, no. 4 (Winter 2016), pp. 567–74.

Davis, Caroline, and Marilyn Deegan, eds., Computers and Language (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1992).

Deegan, Marilyn, and Kathryn Sutherland, eds., Text Editing, Print, and the Digital World (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009).

Delany, Paul and George P. Landow, eds., Hypermedia and Literary Studies (1991; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).

Dowler, Lawrence, ed., Gateways to Knowledge: the Role of Academic Libraries in Teaching, Learning, and Research (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).

Drucker, Johanna, SpecLab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

Drucker, Johanna, ‘Why Distant Reading Isn’t’, PMLA, vol. 132, no. 3 (May 2017), pp. 628–35.

Eve, Martin, Close Reading with Computers (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2019 [forthcoming]).

Eve, Martin, Open Access and the Humanities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).

Felluga, Dino, ‘The Eventuality of the Digital’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol. 21 (2015), p. none. <http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.742>.

Finneran, Richard J., ed., The Literary Text in the Digital Age (Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1996).

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen, Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy (New York: New York University Press, 2011).

Fraser, Hilary, and Jerome McGann, ‘Nineteenth-Century Digital Worlds: Hilary Fraser Interviews Jerome McGann’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol. 21 (2015), p. none. <http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.758>.

Fyfe, Paul, ‘Reading, Making, and Metacognition: Teaching Digital Humanities for Transfer’, Digital Humanities Quarterly [forthcoming 2018].

Fyfe, Paul, and Richard Menke, ‘Data Copperfield: A Pedagogical Experiment in Distributed Collaboration’, Victorian Periodicals Review, vol. 21, no. 4 (Winter 2016), pp. 559–66.

Gallagher, Rob, and Ana Parejo Vadillo, ‘Animating Sight and Song: A Meditation on Identity, Fair Use, and Collaboration’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol. 21 (2015), p. none. <http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.754>.

Gardiner, Eileen, and Ronald G. Musto, eds., The Digital Humanities: A Primer for Students and Scholars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Gold, Matthew K., and Lauren F. Klein, eds., Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016). See particularly: Paul Fyfe, ‘Mid-Sized Digital Pedagogy’, pp. 104–117.

Harrison, Teresa, and Timothy D. Stephen, Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st-Century University (New York: SUNY Press, 1996).

Holt, Patrick O'Brian, and Noel Williams, eds., Computers and Writing: State of the Art (Oxford: Intellect, 1992).

Jockers, Matthew, Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2013).

Jockers, Matthew, Text Analysis with R for Students of Literature (New York: Springer, 2014).

Jones, Stephen E., The Emergence of the Digital Humanities (London: Routledge, 2013).

Kahle, Brewster, and Ana Parejo Vadillo, ‘The Internet Archive: An Interview with Brewster Kahle’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, vol. 21 (2015), p. none. <http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.760>.

Kennedy, Meegan, ‘Open Annotation and Close Reading the Victorian Text: Using Hypothes.is with Students’, Victorian Periodicals Review, vol. 21, no. 4 (Winter 2016), pp. 550–58.

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G., Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016).

Kolko, Beth E., Alison E. Regan, and Susan Romano, Writing in an Electronic World: a Rhetoric with Readings (London: Longman, 2001).

Landow, George, Hypertext 3.0 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).

Liu, Alan, ‘The State of the Digital Humanities: A Report and a Critique’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 1–2 (February 2012), pp. 8–41. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211427364>.

McGann, Jerome, Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).

McKitterick, David, ed., Do We Want to Keep Our Newspapers? (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication Publications, 2002).

Moretti, Franco, Distant Reading (London: Verso, 2013).

Moretti, Franco, Graphs, Maps, Trees (London: Verso, 2005).

Piper, Andrew, Enumerations: Data and Literary Study (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018).

Piper, Andrew, ‘Think Small: On Literary Modelling’, PMLA, vol. 132, no 3 (May 2017), pp. 651–58.

Pressman, Jessica, Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media, Modernist Literature and Culture, 21 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).

Ramsay, Stephen, Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism, Series- Topics in the Digital Humanities (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2011).

Robinson, Peter, The Digitization of Primary Textual Sources (1993; Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1994).

Samuels, Lisa, and Jerome McGann, ‘Deformance and Interpretation’, New Literary History, vol. 30, no. 1 (1999), pp. 25–56. <https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1999.0010>.

Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, eds., A New Companion to Digital Humanities (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2016).

Shillingsburg, Peter, From Gutenberg to Google (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Siemens, Ray, and Susan Schreibman, eds., A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture (New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).

So, Richard Jean, ‘All Models Are Wrong’, PMLA, vol. 132, no. 3 (May 2017), pp. 668–73.

Sutherland, Kathryn, ed., Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997).

Svensson, Patrik, and David Theo Goldberg, eds., Between Humanities and the Digital (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015).

Tennen, Dennis, Plain Text: The Poetics of Computation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017).

Terras, Melissa M., Julianne Nyhan, and Edward Vanhoutte, eds., Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013).

Underwood, Ted, Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019 [forthcoming]).

Underwood, Ted, ‘A Genealogy of Distant Reading’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 2 (2017), p. none. <http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000317/000317.html> [accessed 13 September 2018].

Underwood, Ted, ‘The Life Cycles of Genres’, Journal of Cultural Analytics, 23 May 2016, <10.31235/osf.io/8629m>.

Underwood, Ted, and Jordan Sellers, ‘The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige’, Modern Language Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3 (September 2016), pp. 321–44. <https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570634>.

Weller, Toni, ed., History in the Digital Age (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012). See particularly: James Mussell, ‘Doing and Making: History as Digital Practice’, pp. 79–94; Brian Maidment, ‘Writing History with the Digital Image: A Cautious Celebration’, pp. 111–26.

Wickman, Matthew, ‘Theology Still?’ PMLA, vol. 132, no. 3 (May 2017), pp. 674–80.

Zeitlyn, David, Matthew David and Jane Bex, eds., Knowledge Lost in Information: Patterns of Use and Non-Use of Networked Bibliographic Resources (Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1999).