On this page
-
Text (3)
-
December 24, 1853] THE LEADER. 1239
-
THE ANTI-POOR-LAW MOVEMENT. Sheffield, D...
-
THE GLASGOW ATHENAEUM. Glasgow Athenaeum...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Lord Palmerston. Kemp Town, !><*• 2^' (7...
hasty zeal with which he 8 anPtl Pned-the absolutist volution of the 2 nd of December , although , two months afterwards , the most formal and emphatic pproval of the Premier was expressed in the House f Commons after mature deliberation . Lord Palnierston ' s reply , on that occasion , to-the unfair attack made upon him by Lord John Kussell , who well knew that his adversary ' s tongue was tied , and that he had consented to withhold certain painful disclosures , was , notwithstanding these
disadvantages , a triumphant one . He affirmed , -without contradiction , that , on the very day upon which he had expressed his qualified approval of the coup d' & at , in conversation with the French Ambassador , his censor , Lord John Russell , the President of the Council , and even his successor at the Foreign Office had likewise expressed favourable opinions on the subject . Therefore a too hasty expression of opinion could not have been the real cause of his dismissal .
On the 6 th of December , Lord Normanby stated to M . de Turgot , in Paris , that " He was sure , that had his Government known of the suppression of the Rouges at the time he had heard from them , he should have been commissioned to add their congratulations to his own ! " But Lord Palmerston , in his celebrated despatch to Lord Normanby , written ten days afterwards , gave it as his opinion that , " As to approving or condemning the step taken by the President in dissolving the Assembly , he conceived it was for the French nation , and not for the British Secretary of State , or for the British Ambassador , to pronounce judgment upon that event ; but if his Excellency
wished to know his own opinion on the change which had taken place in France , it was that such a state of antagonism had arisen between the President and the Assembly , that it was becoming every day more clear that their co-existence could not be of long duration ; and it seemed to him better for the interests of France , and through them for the rest of Europe , that the power of the President should prevail , inasmuch as the continuance of his authority might afford a prospect of the maintenance of social order in France , whereas the divisions of opinions and parties in the Assembly appeared to betoken that their victory over the President would be the starting point for disastrous civil strife . "
The fact was that Lord Palmerston s dismissal was a preconcerted scheme , as the following paragraph of a letter from "Vienna , dated December 23 rd , where intelligence of that unexpected event could not then have been received , clearly proves . The alleged reason , therefore , was merely a pretext , and the real cause of the dismissal of the British Minister for Foreign Affairs was , not that he had approved of an absolutist revolution , but , that he had refused to become a mere instrument in the hands of
foreigners to forward the intrigues of certain Princes of the House of Coburg , who were closely allied to almost every despot or pretender in Europe , except Louis Napoleon , and were , therefore , resolved to supplant him at tho first favourable opportunity in the interest of their Bourbon relatives . The following is the paragraph I allude to , which was published at tho time in the Breslau Gazette , dated Vienna , 23 rdDecember , 1851 : —" Rumours are here
current of negotiations said to have been engaged in by high personages in England with our Court without the knowledge of Lord Palmerston . Their object is said to bo a rapprochement hctvrccn tho two Courts , and the retirement of the noble lord from office ' *• ¦ announced as certain to happen soon . The first index of this rapprochement baa been the admission of Lord Westmoreland to an audience , and his invitation to dinner by the Emperor . "
With respect to Lord Palmers ton ' s late resignation , it lias been asserted that ho " now quits tho service of tho public because he cannot induce himself to support even a moderate scheme of reform . But an attentive observer of political events in this country is of opinion , that the noble lord has , in truth , rcfiigned his offlco from an unwillingness to fi « e tho alliance between England and Franco compro mised by German intrigue , or tho honour and interest of Croat Britain sacrificed to tho Austrian policy of tho King of tho Belgians , who now secretly rules the councils and destinies of England . —I have the honour to be , Sir , your obedient scRvant , W . C .
December 24, 1853] The Leader. 1239
December 24 , 1853 ] THE LEADER . 1239
The Anti-Poor-Law Movement. Sheffield, D...
THE ANTI-POOR-LAW MOVEMENT . Sheffield , Dec . 22 , 1853 . ( To the Editor of the Leader , ) Sir , —Will you permit me to offer a few observations on your strictures upon the Anti-Poor-law meeting which was held in Manchester last week ? You say the movement ought to fail , because it is not confined to the " abuses" of the Poor-law Board . In my judgment this opinion is somewhat hastily formed , or else your real meaning is not very clearly expressed . The whole history of ftie New Poor-law is one of deceit and trickery . It was passed by interested misrepresentation , and has been continued ever since by the same unscrupulous means . All the abuses flow
from the principle involved in the law—that of centralisation . The yoke is becoming more and more galling every day . None can conceive the extent of the evil except they experience it in a practical manner . In Sheffield we have felt it in many w ay s , and groaned under it , until there is a fixed resolve amongst many' of our best men not to hold office so long as the harassing and vexatious centralising action of thePoor-law Board exists . I will give you a recent instance of this absurd and improper , though legal interference . The parish of Sheffield is divided into five townships , of which Nether Hallam , wherein
I have long resided , is one . In the year 1800 , a common was enclosed , and a central portion was awarded to the township , upon which a workhouse was built . The figure of a working bee-hive , in stone , adorns the front of the building , indicating that it was really a uwrA-house . The present " unions , " or workhouses , are places where the inmates are compelled to play , by way of a labour test . On the introduction of the New Poor-law into Sheflield , the township of Nether Hallam was absorbed in one of the unions , where a magnificent " Bastille" ( thename by which it is common ! v designated ) was erected out of
borrowed money . The centralisers have long cast a covetous eye upon our old workhouse , which they wished to be sold , but the rate-payers have always resisted the various attempts that were made to accomplish this object , and have retained possession of the workhouse for meetings on parochial and ^ other public business . In consequence of the rapid increase of population in the township , and the far greater activity displayed by the rate-payers on local matters than heretofore , it has bee n found that the building which was sufficient for the requirements of the year 1800 is inconvenient for the present period .
, The overseers of the poor have had the subject under their careful consideration a long time . In June last ( six months ago ) , they called a special public vestry meeting for the purpose of considering the matter , and the meeting was numerously attended . The overseers submitted plans , specifications , and estimates for a new vestry hall , which was to cost 600 / They stated that they had saved this sum from time to time , and it was then in the Bank ; so that no rate would bo wanted to erect the new hall . After considerable discussion , the report ot the and
overseers was unanimously adopted , they were authorised to proceed forthwith , bo far tor local self-government ; now for the centralising Poor-law Board . It appears that it was necessary for the overseers to obtain the consent of the Poor-law Board to what the vestry had decided upon , and all the documents were Sent up for that purpose . Nothing could apparently be more easy and simple ; but what is the fact ? A public wardmote of the burgesses of the township was held in the workhouse on tho 5 th of this month . The Sheffield Free Press , of the 10 th inst ., contains the following report of part of the
proceedinKfl—" New Vestry Hatl . —Mv . Smith , tho vestryclerk , stated that tho overseera had had a ycxy long and tedious correspondence with tho Poor-law Board , on tho subject of the new vestry hall . The correspondence was , in fact , immense . Ihe Poor-law Board had raised many objections , and made many inquiries , which were promptly met and answered by the overseers . He thought they were approaching a conclusion now , and that the Board were nearly satisfied . The overseers had been fettered in every step that they had taken in tho matter by the
Poorlaw Board ; and in consequence of tho long delay which the Board had occasioned , tho hall would coat more in erection than was originally estimated , labour and materials having advanced . " This is one instance of tho obstruction caused by tho obnoxious principle inherent in the Now Poor-law . Similar annoyances arc being experienced all over tho country , wherever its baleful influence extends . Is it to be wondered at , therefore , that tho Manchester meeting decided on going for tho entire abolition of tho Board ? Tho fact is , that we in tho provinces
manage our highways woll enough without any central influence ; and wo think wo can also manage tfic relief of tho poor in the Kiuno manner . At all evontH wo are determined to try . —Yours , faithfully , Ibaao Ikonsidio .
The Glasgow Athenaeum. Glasgow Athenaeum...
THE GLASGOW ATHENAEUM . Glasgow Athenaeum , Dec . 21 , 1853 . ( To the Editor of the Leader . ) Sib , —Our Athenaeum is a non-sectarian institution , professedly . In theory , it knows nothing of religious sect nor political party . It is strictly a secular institution , and is supported by men of every shade " of theological opinion . Still , it is an eminently , pious institution . It has an orthodox board of directors , purged some years ago , by special effort of Free Kirk , and other " evangelicals" of all heresy , honest enough to avow itself . It is strict as to the reputed orthodoxy of its lecturers , and , as an unfortunate result , its lectures are very tame and very
uninteresting . Indeed , our Athenaeum is a verymodel of pious respectability , but somewhat whining and sickly withal . It keeps the Sabbath , too , and connives at no reading of profane newspapers or magazines on that holy day ; consequently , its reading-room , a beautiful hall capable of accommodating about 600 persons , is unoccupied on the Sabbath , for the purposes of the institution , and a revenue has been derived from letting it as a place of worship .
The members never regarded this as anything but a matter of business ; it never occurred to them that it was any part of the duties of the directors whom they elected to sit in judgment on the peculiar opinions of those who from time to time applied to rent it , and decide that " this sect may worship here , but that shall not . " Nor , indeed , until very recently , did it ever occur to the directors themselves , that such was their duty ; and , in blesse d ignorance , of this weighty responsibility , they rented their hall to the " Morisonians , " who occupied it so long as they required its use . Afterwards the hall was let
to the Wesleyans , who now occupy it , and another hall in the institution is , I believe , let to a " Christian Institute , " the members of which , with more zeal than wisdom , wage war from week to week with Scepticism , Secularism , and all manner of obnoxious isms . The halls were , however , let as sources of revenue , and it was never supposed by any one that the institution , in so doing , identified itself with either M orisonianism , or Wesleyanism , or with this termagant Christian Institute . So matters went smoothly on until the Unitarians applied for the hall , on the usual terms , when it should be evacu-Wellthe of
ated by its present occupants . , course action was clear . The hall had been let without any question as to the views of its occupants heretofore , why should the Unitarians be subjected to exclusion more than others ? The rent would be as safe from them , and they would at least conduct their worship with no less decorum than those to whom the hall had been let . Let them have it . So would you have disposed of the question south of the Tweed . Not so thought the directors of the Glasgow Athenaeum . It was a serious matter to act consistently ; with fear of parsons before them , they member of the board
couldn't do it . And a sleek suggested that the matter should be disposed of quietly—that the secretary should be instructed to inform the parties that the directors did not feel at liberty to enter into any further arrangements regarding the hall at present . The suggestion was approved , and communicated to the applicants ; but tho Unitarians , plain-dealing , matter-of-fact sort of people as they are , wouldn't see the full meaning of the smooth reply , accordingly , after allowing aomo time to elapse , they renewed their application , Avith a request that they should have a final yea or nay , in reply . This was was too direct to be evaded- tho matter was discussed , and , after confessing that the Unitarians were " above the average ot the
community in intelligence , " that they were " menof unimpeachable integrity , " & c , the board decided that , being Unitarians , they should not worship their God in the hall of tho Athenaoum . Let it be said , however for tho honour of tho institution , that this infamous decision was not unanimous , that there was even amongst thoso orthodox directors five " good men and true , " who entered their protest against it , and gave consistent testimony in behalf of complete religious toleration . Could you have believed it , Mr . Editor , that at this time of day , when even our universities are ridding themselves of religioustcstR tho directors of an institution , purely literary in its character , could bo so bigoted and priest-ridden as to * Btultify themselves by the introduction into its management of theological
tests , which tho Bpirit and letter ot its constitution disown ? Tho decision seems to me , Sir , a disgrace to the institution , and unless its members bestir thoniHcilves to reverso this procedure on tho part of the directors , it must be regarded simply us a tool of sectarianism , and it muat become a question with tho liberal members how far they can , in justice to themselves , continue to support it . —I am , yours , & c , An Om > MifiMuisn oir the Institution .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 24, 1853, page 15, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_24121853/page/15/
-