On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Mr . Bright begged to remind the House that the motion was , " without payment of fees . " The motion was then agreed to .
MISCELLANEOUS . Lord Eobeet Gbosvenob heat the Government on Thursday . He moved for leave to bring in bis annual bill , to repeal the annual and rather onerous duty levied on Attorneys and Solicitors . The motion was resisted by Mr . Gladstone , on the ground that it was the wrong time for proposing the abolition of a tax . The motion , however , was carried , by 219 to 167 . Mr . Apsley Pellatt made an unsuccessful attempt , the same night , to get a committee to inquire into the subject of oaths . Mr . Gladstone again objected .
The inquiry into the substitution of declarations for oaths was unnecessary , as it had given universal satisfaction ; with respect to extending that substitution to courts of law , there was now a commission sitting on procedure , and that was the proper place for the inqniry ; and , as to inquiry with the view to substituting one uniform declaration for the oaths now taken by members of Parliament , that was too important to be handed over to a select committee . Therp was a general concurrence with Mr . Gladstone , so the motion was withdrawn .
Mr . Fitzkoy has brought in a bill for the better prevention and punishment of aggravated assaults on women and children . This bill was received with very great satisfaction . Some members , however , and even the mover himself , wished that the penalty of " corpo ral punishment" had been extended to those gross and ruffianly exhibitions , which are absolutely too common in our police courts to attract that notice they demand .
ELECTION COMMITTEES . The Parliamentary battue still continues . The committees have made some severe decisions this week ; and there seems to be a strong desire to make a clean sweep of the really alarming mass of corruption brought to light . Chatham . —The committee have decided after the strictest investigation : — " That Sir J . Mark Frederick Smith is not duly elected » burgess to serve in the present Parliament for the borough of Chatham . " That the last election for the said borough is a void election .
" That it was proved to the committee that Joseph Greathead , an elector at Chatham , had been bribed by a situation as letter-carrier in the General Post-Offiee , obtained by his son , Charles Greathead , by or through the influence of Sir Frederick Smith . " That it -was proved before the committee that a large number of the electors of the borough of Chatham are employed in her Majesty ' s dockyard and other public departments , and that they are under the influence of the Government for the time being , and that it appears there is no instance of a candidate being elected for the borough of Chatham who has not had the support of the Government .
" That , under these circumstances , it will bo for the house to determine whether the right of returning a member should not in future be withdrawn from the borough of Chatham . " That it is the opinion of the committee that there are strong grounds for believing that one Stephen Mount , in giving his evidence before tho committee , was guilty of wilful and corrupt perjury . " Writ suspended until the 11 th of April .
Deiujy . —All the well known story of the Derby bribery , minus " W . H ., " has been again before the public , on the petition against Mr . HorHfnll . Our readers will remember that Mr . Flewker was intrusted witli the secrets of the Horsfull , that is tho Cox and " W . B . " party ; that he allowed the bribery machinery to get in motion ; allowed Mr . Thomas Morgan to instal himself in the County Tavern , and Mr . Lund to bring him money ; and that then be told nil to the other Bide . Hero is an account of the arreot of Morgan by Fern , the policeman , who performed that feat : —
On tho morning of tho election ho went to tho County Tavern , in consequence of instructions from tho last witness . Certain nignals wore communicated to him . lie went up stairs , and at tho top mot Kallow , who attempted to stop him , but witness put bin linger to the mdo of Iuh nose—( laughter )—upon which Kallow miid , " That ' s all right . " Witness also said , " It ' s all right ; Rudford sent me . " Kallow allowed witness to go into tho room , where ho found Morgan before a table with a small book and two or three p ieces of papor . Ho took Morgan into custody and searched him . In Morgan ' s pocket ho found one 10 / ., hin
and six U . notes of the bank of England , ami in trouscr ' s pockets a bag containing 134 / . in Hovoreignn and half HovoreignH , and tho celebrated " W . II . " letter . Ho also found four cards on Morgan , two of thoso cards had on thorn , " Mr . T . Morgan , " and tho othor two , " Mr . T . Morgan , Cluster . " Tho p ieces of paper ho found on the table turnod out to be bank notes . ( Laughter . ) WitnoBH lodged Morgan in tho lock-up . Asked hie nnmo and where ho came from , and ho replied it was on Inn cnnl . Next day Morgan told witness he came from Shrewsbury , and not from Ch « ntor . Witness asked him why ho put Chester on Iub card , and Morgan replied because Frail had expressed n vtisk . to him that ho should do ao . Morgan also
stated to witness that the night before the election a man had broug ht him a bag of gold , and in the morning another , and some notes . The man who brought the money was a tallish thin man , dressed in drab clothes . It was nearly dark when he brought him the first money , and he therefore thought he should not know him again , unless he had some conversation ( with him . Witness knew Thomas Lund , who answered this description . Morgan told witness he paid the money away to persons who brought cheques . He entered the numbers of the cheques in his book , and the sums he paid for each , adding that " if they had not found his book they would have been bothered . " Morgan said he did not know that the persons he gave the money to were voters , and that when he was coming from Shrewsbury he thought it was to act as a poll-clerk , and that if he had really known what they wanted him for he would have seen them hanged first .
( Laughter . ) Morgan also told witness that if he had been in the room two minutes earlier he would have seen a man in a brown coat who had paid away twice as much money as Morgan . Morgan also said Derby was a poor place ; that they gave as much money for one vote at Shrewsbury as they gave at Derby for twenty . ( Laughter . ) The money the Derbyites had given him wo uld not have lasted him two hours at Shrewsbury . Cross-examined—Did not pump Morgan . Morgan indeed did not require pumping —( laughter )—for he had been imbibing that which was calculated to make him loquacious , i . e . brandy and water . ( Laughter . ) On thenway to the lock-up they had two quarts of ale . The magistrates who took Morgan ' s statement were of both political parties . Morgan was confused and excited ; and , on hearing the noise outside the court , said , " Tell ' em if I get free I'll g ive them a few barrels of ale . " When witness arrested Morgan he fell , apparently stupified , over the fireplace , and exclaimed , " Lord deliver us . " ( Laughter . )
The committee desired , hut have been frustrated in obtaining evidence as to where the money came from ; and Mr . Lund , who wore drab when he took money to Morgan , Mr . Cox , the go-between , who got the note to Frail from " W . B . " at the Carlton , could not be found ; and Henry Radford , of " horsenail" celebrity is ill in bed . Mr . Horsfall was examined , and distinctly denies that he knew anything either directly or indirectly , about the illegal practices of his agents . He had remitted 800 ? . to Derby ; his expenses were 579 ? ., and he had received the balance . The following is the report of the committee : —
" That Michael Thomas Bass , Esq ., was duly elected as a burgess , at the last election , to serve in the present Parliament for the borough of Derby . " That Thomas Berry Horsfall , Esq ., was not duly elected to serve as a burgess in the present Parliament , at the last election for the borough of Derby . " That Lawrence HeyWorth , Esq ., Was duly elected , and ought to have been returned to serve as a burgess , at the last election for the borough of Derby . " That the committee nave altered the poll of the last election for the borough of Derby , by striking therefrom , as having received bribes at the said election , the names of William Harris , William Morley , Thomas Blake , Eobert Walcup , RichardWalcup , Francis Radford , Thomas Taylor , Henry Needham , John Swan , Francis Staley , Charles Cockaigne , Edward Cockaigne , William Oliver , and Henry Sharrock .
" That Thomas Berry Horsfall was , by his agents , guilty of bribery at the last election for the borough of Derby , but it has been proved to the satisfaction of the committee that such bribery was altogether without the concurrence or privity of Mr . Horsfall . " That William Harris was bribed by 31 ., William Morley by 21 ., and a supplementary payment of 11 . in October subsequently to tho election . That Thomas Bloke , Jiobcrt Walcup , Richard Walcup , Francis Radford , Thomas Taylor , Henry Needham , John Swan , Francis Staley , Charles Cockaigne , Edward Cockaigne , and Henry Sharrock , were bribed by 21 . each , and William Oliver by 11 . " That Thomas Morgan seems to have been tho person principally engaged in the above-mentioned acts of bribery , and that the funds for tho same purpose appear to have boon furnished to Morgan through the instrumentality of a person named Thomas Lund .
" That George Clayton , John Ford , and Alfred Akcrmon , wero likewise engaged in those various acts of bribery and corruption . " That it has boon proved , iih to several of the other par - ties , that , at former elections , they had received money for their votes , and the committee have reason to believe that such corrupt practices have been prevalent in the borough of Derby , and they desire to state their opinion that parties once reported to the Houso m guilty of bribery should bo disqualified for the future for tho exercise of umy Parliamentary franchise . " That it appears to tho committee that tho petition ot William Pool , ho fur an regards tho returnof Michael Thomas . Buss , Knq ., is frivolous and vexatious . " The committee then separated .
IIuddkhhjmiiA > . —At this borough tho bribery took the form of beer and solids . Then ' there was tho peculiar practice of " tattling up" electors . Of the first process take a random specimen . Mr . Scarlett , brewer , at lluddernfiold , admitted that-he had sent out iiino . 'HJ-gallon , casks of ale , and three 24-gallon casks on the day of the election , and that an entry of 12 / . for that ale , from . Stunnfiold ' a committee , in bis books , was in the handwritin g of one of his clerks . Joshua Hullawell deposed to forty gallons of ale coming to him , and to thirty gallons remaining , which ho sold . His uncle had long promimxl his vote for Stansliold . Tho ale w « s called " Election ale . " William Bedford , of tho Mox and Grapeu , Hudderefield ,
a voter , examined—Had a rote in 1847 , and voted for Stansfield . Witness had an account against Mr . Booth , who was a supporter of Stansfield . Beeeived about 81 . in 1847 , and the balance left was in the shape of ten per cent ., which was then taken off . Was canvassed by Wrilan 8 party at the last election . Mr . J . Beaumont saw witoew about his vote for Stansfield . Perhaps he might have asked Beaumont about his oU account and the payment ! of the discount , but Beaumont did not say he would pay it if witness voted for Stansfield . Beaumont said he would have nothing to do with it . Knew a number of beershopkeepers , Tjut never said he would not vote for Stansfield until the old account was paid . Had an account at the last election for breakfasts . It had been paid by Mr . J . Beaumont , and witness put the old " discount on the new bill , which had been paid altogether . Had not seen Leech _
. .. . Cross-examined—Put the " discount" down by charging a little higher for the items . Had promised Stansfield a long time , and could not vote for a man who wanted to divide " Church and State . " ( Laughter . ) Re-examined—Received the orders for breakfast on the nomination day from John Sykes , for twelve or fifteen people . They came back . The amount of the bill sent in was 10 ? . Evidence was taken to pTove what was termed the " bottling up" of witnesses , and treating thefn at the George during the evening before , and also on the day of the election , free of expense , by the agents of the sitting member . Two old men , of between seventy and
eighty years of age , and who complained that it was " a shame" to bring them all the way from Htiddexw * field , deposed that they were thns bottled up at the George , and supplied free and freely with beds arid brandy-and-water . Other witnesses spoke to having distributed " free gratis" thirty-six gallons of beer on the nomination day , and sixty gallons on the potting day ; at the instigation of agents of the sitting member . One of these witnesses said he had not been paid for this , and calculated he was a loser by it , and that it was not done to influence his vote . HtrLii . —Here they have a plan of bribery , probably not peculiar to the place , but as yet undescribed before the committee . The main agent in the business describes the thing very well : —
J . " Walker , of Manchester , basket-maker , deposed that he knew'Wild , who arranged with him to attend to the general duties of the committee-room in Saville-street , to put down the names of voters who came to vote for Clay and Goderich . The persons who came there and had their names so put down , expected to be paid for their time . By that he meant the usual custom , that a man should be paid for bis time when he went to vote . That was the way it was understood in Hull . ( Laughter . ) Was not istered for other
aware of persons being reg any purpose . The list lie alluded to was a special list of persons sent from the district committees of workmen who expected to be paid for their time . If a voter came into the room , and his name was put down in the list , witness and tie committee would expect him to -vote for their party . It was a common expression among the people of Hull , getting their names " set down" in this way . Witness looked after those voters , and employed himself actively in getting them to go to Saville-street . Many voters came with papers from the district committees , on which were the names of
persons to be employed six days . About 300 or 400 names were put down in this way altogether , but no money was paid them at the time . Witness took 20 or 30 of these kinds of voters who had their names set down to the poll , and they voted for Clay and . Goderich . Could not say he saw Wild pay them any money , 'but after the election he had seen many people in King-street , who told him they were waiting for their money . Know they were paid , and saw the money in their hands . It was generally a sovereign and a half . Was present when Wild put his signature to these papers . Witness received 3101 . from Wild on tho day of the election , and witness paid some of tho voters money on taking them to the poll . One voter , on being aeked how it was ho received 30 s . for only two days instead of six , said , " Oh , it ' s a common practice m Hull all parties do it ! " In addition to getting their names sat
down , tho voters got glasses of grog ; but these were finings witncsB could not speak to more particularly , as theywere things he did not remember after they were gon «; wa * it was a usual thing in Hull , when they wanted to matte- a voter " all right , " to give him grog . On the polling day , a dozen voters met at the Queen ' s Arms , and had thennamoB set down and grog , for which they did not pay : but tho bill and tho voters were paid afterwards . Did not know by whom , and had rather not answer the question . They were paid . Witness saw them each with a eovereign and a half . Remembered negotiating with the 30 men , who wished their number multiplied by 10 , and told them ho coujd not go beyond tho " market price . " The witness caused some amusement by several times hesitating to answer certain questions , for fear , as he phrased it , of " criminating himself . "
Was never called upon by Wild to render any account , but received from Wild altogether between 30 * . and 40 ? WitnoeB had received 50 J . for his ovidenco before tho committee . Did not consider this bribery . ( Laughter . ) Kollett came to him to get tho information he hod given in bin ovideneo , and they talked together " about the boseneHH of tho electoral system generally , " and this ha d been a standing opinion of witness for many years . ( Laughter . ) Prior to the passing of tho Tteform Bill , a freeman always got 21 . for a split voto , and U . for a plumper ; but sineo that HVBtem wub abolished , tho new votors wore tk © most difficult to manage . They did not know their price-WitnoHH was speaking of tho \ 0 l . householders in tho former case . Now the " market price" had dwindled down to 30 » . ahead . There was ( duo tho custom , on both aid « s ,
Untitled Article
k 244 THE LEADER . [ Saturday ^
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), March 12, 1853, page 244, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1977/page/4/
-