On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    Snu w * « wfe * Th « 80 , 000 * . ftr which the Ifctgfc ! " £ T £ e Smpaay was « pri «* of w * r sefeed by the 2 y ? m ! w *» ***** ' ««««» toi- ^ a 8 deposed SCrfa *™ - It belonged more to the Crown than KhbTW India Company ; andUnder these circrnn-! 2 ^ fcTwoTild 8 agg « s * tlwi * tbA attention of the law 2 JS 3 ? the Grown should be d « wn to the- subject .

    THE IRISH MILITIA . tWd DimGAinroir inquired of Lord PAimtBEwhe-Aarftelrad received any official communication of the SlSaTof fifty-seven men of the city of Limerick Story Militia from Yonghal on the 5 th inst ., who SsSeredto depart , many of them with scarcely any Sng , and who had to proceed all the way to LimetR *? -w « & only sixpence allotted to each individual ? Andafeo , whether it was correct that two hnndred and Sty men were discharged on the 10 th inst . from the Curragb , belonging to the Mayo Rifles , to find their way home , with on ly one da y ' s pa y a ll otted to t h em , and that about an equal number of the Queen s County Militia wer ^ sent away without any clothing whatever i — : Lord JtANHUBB said he had received no information to the-effect indicated by L ord D unga n non . JSTANDINO OUDER . 9 . In . the' House op Commons , on the report of * the

    Standing-Orders' Revision Committee , a discussion arose upon » proposed additional order relating to grants from the Indian revenue , which was finally agreed to in an attended form , the House thereby resolving that it ¦ would not receive any petition or proceed upon any motion for a charge upon the revenues of the East India Company without the consent of the Crown . TIDE GKRJLAN TROOPS AT ALDEKSHOTT . A rather warm discussion ensued on a motion by Mr . BTtTRROUGH for the adjournment of the House . The Son . gentleman diverged into some angry remarks on tiie favouritism shown to the German troops at Aldershott ; but he was interrupted , on the question of order by Mr . Walpolewho urged that some reasons should

    , be given for moving the adjournment . To this , Mr . SfovBBOUGH retorted * that he was about to state his reaaons . —The SpeaiceR thought that' Mr . Wal po l e h ad ver y properl y stated the rule in such matters . —Mr . Mubrough then proceeded : — " It becomes us , as representatives of the public , to speak boldly . The public are indignant on this question . They feel that those troops are countenanced . ( Loud cries of ' Order , order ! ') T h i s may be against the feelings of many hon . gentlemen , but I understand that these men at Aldershott have their huts furnished for them at the expense of this country . "—Here , Mr . Spooler rose to order ; the Speaker again protested ; and a good deal of excited conversation followed , in the course of which ,

    Mr . MtfBKOUGH said his reason for moving the adjournrment was that , in his opinion , no business ought to be proceeded with until the House had some statement from the Government on so important a question . — C o l one l Buck thoug ht this was a reason why the House should not adjourn . —Mr . Muurougii having at length put a definite question in connexion with his cause of co m p laint , Lord Palmekston stated that the German Legi on is on ly accommodated temporarily at Aldershott , and will be removed as soon as arrangements can be made . The furniture for the huts supplied to the

    English officers consists of two chairs , a table , and a firerange ; anything beyond that they provide themselves , WTien the German Legion was stationed at Shomcliffe , they applied for an additional indulgence , and that additional indulgence was a soldier ' s bed and mattress . It so happened that there were some to spare in the ordnance stores , and , considering the short time they had to be there , the accommodation -was afforded . The s ame indul gence liad been granted at Aldershott ; but the Germans had had nothing more than what has been famished to the English officers .

    In answer to Mr . Nbwdeoate , L ord Palmerston stated that the Foreign Legion is not available for garrison or for active duty within the United Kingdom .

    THE RECENT COAL MINE EXPLOSION . Mr . Catley asked whether the Government intends to employ any special means to ascertain the real cireumstunces under which the disastrous loss of one hundred and ten ( some said one hundred and twenty ) livea had just taken p lace from an explosion in a coal miiio in Glamorganahiro ?—Sir George Grey answered that three inspectors would attend the adjourned inquest , and assist in a searching investigation .

    THE BUKNINO OF THE KtJROPA . Lord Pai . mekston , in answer to Captain Akohdau , stated that the Government intends to take into consideration the propriety of erecting a monument to tbo memory of Colonol Moore ami the men , l oat by the burning of the Europa in 1861 . Tho Attorney-General , in answer to Mr . IIadfield , stated that ho did not intend to proceed this Bossion with tbo Criminal Ari'icoriuATioN and Timer Property Bii , l ; and Mr . Bainks , in answer to Lord Roukrt Ciccn , , said that tho Duiavich Collkok Hill would bo withdrawn for tho present .

    THE CRIMEAN INQUIRY ltKPORT . Mr . ViLuifliia brought up the report of tho Crimean Coinnuiaaiouora , and at tho name time indignantly ropolled a romark attributed to Lord Lucan , that he ( Mr . VilliorB ) had doiuyed the report for tho purpose of

    serving the objects of the Minister-of Warn . He eoald ¦ hardly believe that the noble lord had mad * mush a statement , because "it would be impossible for any man to- utter ft more unmitigated and unequivocal untruth . " Hie had not drawn up the report , nor had he > delay edi i * ; indeed , he had not the means of delaying it . So fian from the inquiry having been biassed by political prejudice against Lord Lucany every- member of the Board ! was o f t h e same po l it i cs as h is l or d s h ip , and these of tho members were political partisans of the Earl . —General Pbbl confirmed Mr . Villiere ' s- statements as to the fairness of the Board ' s proceedings , and tile groundlessness of the charge brought forward by Lord Lucan .

    MR . JAMES SADXEIR . On the unopposed motion of Mr . Roebuck , Mr . James Sadleir was ordered to attend in his . place on Thursday .

    EAST INDIA BUDGET . On the question that the House go into- committee to consider the East India Company ' s r eve n ue accou n t , Mr . Isaac Btttt mov e d , as an amendment , that the House go into committee to consider the- claims- of "his Highness Meer Ali Moorad , ' for the unjust confiscation of his revenue * and territories . —The- S pk akbb decided that this a m endment w as out of o r der , and the House therefore went into committee on the Indian Budget . Mr . Yernon Smith : then made his annual statement . O n t h e h ea d of re v enue , the balance-sheet of income and expenditure had * shown a deficit of two millions sterling in the financial year 1853-4 , and of one million in 1854-5 ; it was expected to show a deficiency of one and

    a- half million for the twelve months now current . This resu l t , h o w ever , was attributable to the large expenditure incurred for-public works * , which would , he believed in theend ^ amply repay their cost . He had been mistaken in supposing last year that the deficiency was solel y attributed to public works ; other causes had contributed . With regard to the sources of revenue , it would be necessary to make a new survey and a fresh assessment : for Madras . Upon the whole , he thought ther e was n o reason to d e s pair of a s u rp lus revenue from the ordinary sources ; but it would be necessary to diminish expenditure . The army it wo uld be i m po l it i c to reduce ; but he though t t h e sa l a r ies i n t h e civi l ser v ice w ere fartoo h ig h . He had also recommended large

    reductions with respect to public works . Passing f r om financial to general considerations , Mr . Vernon Smith described the state of India as tranquil . The possession of H erat b y the Persians is in violation of treaty , and intimation to that effect had been given to Persia . Should that occupation not cease ,, the honour of the English Crown must be vindicated , and the treaty main .-rained . The annexation of Oude was absolute ^ necessary , considering the conduct of the Bang , and he therefore denied the justice of the charge that had been brought against the Indian Government of a tendency to annexation . Materialimprovernents were advancing in India . The electric telegraph , under the direction of Dr . O'Shaughnessy , had been protracted four thousand miles

    at an expe n se of 2 , 000 , 0007 . Alterations had been made inr the Post-office ; reforms , Which were much needed , were i n p r o gress in connexio n w i t h the police ; torture was being suppressed and education encouraged . With respect to the latter subject , the hon . gentleman observed that directors , and inspectors of schools had been appointed , a n d ed u cational establishments of some pretension , had been commenced in various places . In some of these , meetings were h e l d , at which an English essay was read , and occasional discussions took place in the vernacular tongue . H e co ul d not , however , but confess that he was not altogether satisfied with the progress of education , and trusted that on the next occasion , he should have a more satisfactory statement to offer on this head . Connected with this subject was tho question , aa to what was done

    at home with regard to the examinations of candidates in this country . The total number , of candidates : examined this year was fifty-six , just one-half of thei number who presented themselves last year . Viva voce examinations had been here substituted for written replies , with great success . It had been objected by the member for E nnis k il l en t h at I ris hm en h ad b e e n u n iform ly excluded from the bench of India . He ( Mr . Vernon Smith ) had taken occasion to inquire into that subject , and he found that tho hon . member ' s comp laint was in fact a just one . When , therefore , vacancies occurred in tho places of three judges , he hnd filled up those vacancies by appointing two members of the Irish bar and an Irish gentleman . Mr . Vcmon Smith concluded by moving certain resolutions in accordance with tho top ics included in his speech .

    Sir Euskine Perry compl ained t h at t h e C o u r t of Directors of tho East India Company , though merely trustees for tho Crown , assumed powers , and expended money out of tho revenues of India , independentl y of the Board of Control . Thero were somo discrepancies between tho speech of Mr . "Vernon Smith and tho statements of Lord Dallionsio and of tho Indian authorities with respect to tho finances of India and to the amount expended upon public works . A reform in the administration of justice in India was a need of most pressing importance ; bnt it would ho extremely injudicious to effect a large saving by reducing tho salnrioa of civil servants , among whom thcro should bo introduced a largo number of natives . Tho annexation of

    Oude h « looked on as icapoMtie and unjust . Solemn . tvMties hod teen set aside , and-the name of England had been tarnished ; but the- fault vested , net bo much , a » he-oace-thought , with Lord BaBwmaie ( for he- hadejcpressed : am opinion against annexation } as with the Coort off' Directors . —Sir James Bogo defended the annexation : of Oude , on aecoant of the atrocities practised by the King . —Mr . Hkadlam condemned the coarse pursued towards the Indian Law Commission - and Mr . Lowe , on behalf of bis colleagues of the fcaw GemmAss i on ^ did not scrupte ' to-say that , if they had- supposed t h at , after the enornxras * tetxmr they had undergone , tfte result would be sent to . Iadi * to be reported upon there , they would not have undertaken the task .- —Mr . Otwat

    severely criticized the Indian Oovernment and the Bast India Company for several 1 instances- of mismanagement and injustice . —Mr . Danby Sjeymouk replied , and expl ained that t h e di s crepa n c y in th e accounts relating to public works was owing to the accounts having been made up under the old system : next y ear , matters would be more uniform . Great progress was being made in the civilization of India . — Mr . Mangles also defended the Indian Government . Mr . Isaac Butt briefly called attention to thB hard treatment of Meer Ali Moocad . —Mr . Veknon Smith , in . a b r ief rep ly , expl ained , with ; reference to the report of the l a w commissio n , that he was not aware that any compact h ad b ee n e n tered i n to wit h t h e com m i s s i oners t h at their recommendations should at once become law . From communications he had had with his noble friend

    Lord Canning , he entertained no doubt uiat the recomm e nda tions- of t h e com m issio n ers w o uld be carried in to e ff ect as speedi ly as possible . The Commissioners on the Penal Codie had also reported , and he hoped the Legislative Council would be enabled at an . earl y period to give effect to the most important suggestions contained in their report . —In answer to Mr . Otwat , he said he was not aware that Mr . Theobald , t h e la w professo r at the Calcutta Institute , w ho first b rou ght the subject of torture in India under the notice . of that House , bad been dismissed from office . If he had been ,, he did not believe that it was owing , as M r . Otway hinted , to revenge on tile part of the East India Company . The resolutions were then agreed to , and the House resumed . T he L ords ' amendments on the Parochial Schools ( Scotland ) Bill were thrown out after some

    dis-. The Bbshobs * Retjeembnt Bnx "was read a first time . APPELLATE JURISBICTKHf ( HOtJSS ! OT LORDS ) BILL . On the motion of Mr . Raikes Gurbie , the following members were nominated as a select committee , onjjje ^ w above bill : —Mr . Raikes Currie , Lord John RusseIL 7 Mr . Attorney-General , Sir James Graham , Mr . Henley , Mr-Gladstone , Lord Stanley , the Lord Advocate , Mr . Attorney-General for Ireland , Mr . Walpole , Sir Francis B aring , Mr . _ Baines , Mr . Cairns , Mr . Evelyn Denison , and Mr . Mai ins . The subjoined 1 bills ¦ were read a third time , and passed : —The Charities Bnx , the Hospitals ( Dublin ) Bill , the Burial Grounds ( Irelamd ) Bill , the Mebcantxlk Law Amendment Bui , the Lunatic Asylum Supeoaknuaxton ( Ireland ) Bill , and the Jonrr-STOCK GOBEPAJSIKS BlLL .

    Tuesday , July 2 Hnd . LOBD LUCAN AND THUS JUDCE-ADVOCAXE OF THB CRIMEAN UOABJO . Lord Lucan called attention to the charges brought against him by Mr . Villiers in the House of Commons on the previous evening , and asserted that that gentleman had misrepresented what he ( Lord Lucau ) had said on a previous occasion . Ho merely intended to offier a . few remarks on . certain defects in tho construction ' of military couzts , as evidenced b y the Ch e l sea B oard , and on the impropriety of making a political partisan : the legal adviser of such bodies . He denied that he had charged Mr . Villiers with purposely delaying tho repocb , and he repudiated the insinuation that he had had

    communication with Lord LLardingo on matters connected witli the proceedings of the Board , and with their report . His Lordship concluded : — " I would g ive a piece of advice to the learned gentleman , which , is , that holding : as he does a judicial situation , and . being supposed thereby to have the benefit of judicial immunity , he ( fop nM in fusturo be a little rnoro careful in the langruage he uflesi when speaking of others . " —To this , Lord Panmursb applied : — " Having hoard the observations that luwe just boc n r aado b y tho noble EarL I think I cannot do bettor than giv « ldm tho advice he has just given to the learned Judge-Advocate ,, viz ., to be a little more careful in tho language he applies to others . I certainly

    understood , and it must bo within the recollection of your lordships , that tho noblo Earl asserted that tl * a Judge-Advocate had drawn up the report of tho commission , and * that ho usod his position to delay the production of thafcrapoxb IIo was so understood not only by mys « lf , . bu * « iso by those members of tho board who , Uavo a soa-t ia tliM HotUM . '' By tho remarks ho had jiwt naade , bis Lordship Udd txeen bringing into contempt a high authority-, n ot onl y of tho Crown , hut o £ the service to which ho himself bo ~ longti . " I will enter , " concluded ( he Secretary for War , " into no controversy botvreetn two partiee in : different Houses of Parliament , but this much I muatai ^ r , that , if u high ofliocr of tho Crown in tu . be Attacked sad to huvo chargca mado aguinut him in this House , you !

    Untitled Article

    . ' . *™ r - « L-18 n « 1 THB 3 LEABEB . ^

• Citation
  • Leader (1850-1860), July 26, 1856, page 699, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2151/page/3/