On this page
-
Text (2)
- Untitled
-
ARE THE STAKS INHABITED ? Flectricity an...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
An Ameltlcan Thin Keit.. Lectures And Mi...
transparent talk only , and that the beautiful manners he described belonged to an entirely different world from this . " Property makes man a conqueror , a sovereign . " Now Property as an institution of human society expresses or grows out of this instinct of sovereignty in man . While the instinct is as yet misunderstood or unrecognised by the individual , while its full issues are as yet unimagined by him , society lends all her force to educate it under this form of an aspiration after property , or a desire to appropriate to oneself land , houses , money , precious stones , and whatsoever else evidences one ' s power over nature . From the beginning of history , society has known no other function than this , the conservation of the right of private property against the encroachments of merely natural might . Society is
the bulwark which human instinct erects against the forces of outward nature . It is the weapon by which man subdues nature to himself , to the service of his proper infinitude . Look at the moral law for example which lies at the basis of society , and you immediately perceive that its operation is to impose limits upon natural desire , or forbid it invading the bounds of neighbouring property . It says to every man thou shalt not take , nor even desire or covet , anything that is thy neighbour ' s . Thus the moral law is nothing more nor less than an affirmation of the sacredness of private property . It virtually asserts an individuality in man superior to that conferred by his nature . Hence , as I said before , the sole function of society from the beginning has been to guard the interests of property , or elevate human life above the condition of a mere natural community , a mere community of natural interests .
" Let my meaning be clearly understood . I say that the entire aim and business of society hitherto has been to guard the interests of property , or to discriminate sharply between might and right . And I further say that the reason why society makes this discrimination , the reason why it has so jealously espoused the interests of private property , is , that property has always symbolized man ' s destined sovereignty over nature , of which sovereignty society or fellowship among men is the indispensable means or instrument . You all know that either of you individually would be totally incompetent to the subjugation of nature ; that all your present enjoyment of its bounties , the food you eat , the raiment you put on , the house you live in , the streets and roads you traverse , the tools you use , the books you read , the words you employ for the expression of your feelings and thoughts , are all the outgrowth of an organized fellowship or society among men . You will easily understand me therefore when I say that man ' s destined sovereignty over nature can never come about except by society , that society or fellowship among men is its indispensable means , or instrument .
" Property then symbolizes this destined sovereignty . But here you may ask , ' why symbolizes it ? Why may not Property be a final fact itself , symbolizing nothing ? You yourself showed a little while ago how universally men respected it : Why , therefore , should it not end in itself , having no ulterior significance ?' " The answer is plain . Men are ashamed of the respect they pay it . Property cannot be a final fact of history , cannot be a good in itself , cannot be a divine end in humanity , because every man , in proportion to his inward culture , in proportion to his genius , is ashamed of the deference he pays it . He feels this deference to be a mere trick of his servile and scullion nature , and inwardly or individually renounces it every time it recurs . The fact is that it is only among the lowest
persons intellectually , persons in whom the sensuous imagination predominates , that you find any open profession of respect for it left . Among slaves , in fact among negroes as a class , and among the retainers of great families , in short among all persons in whom self-respect has never been developed or fostered , it still exerts an unrebuked dominion . But t . _bcu-o it _otops . iNo man of refinement allows it any _Indulgence . " But there is another reason why private property cannot be considered a final fact of humanity . And this is that in proportion to its magnitude , it teuds to belittle the possessor by overlaying his true sovereignty , his true humanitary attributes .
" A man of very large possessions , unless he has come into them by inheritance , is almost wholly absorbed by them . Instead of being rendered free and careless , his life is a perpetual servitude . His whole energy becomes demanded by the care of his property , while he himself gradually lapses from unqualified manhood into the mere man of money . I believe from information that one of the richest men in town superintends the daily progress of his children in education , and reads Homer with his boys in the original . But he inherited his property . He who made if hud notoriously little time for Homer , or any other elegant accomplishment . Now clearly no one can suppose that to be a final good , or a good in itself , which the more ; it is possessed becomes a burden to the possessor , and the more it is prized becomes a detrrudation to him .
" As a general thing therefore we may say , the larger thc possessions the smaller the man . The more luggage a man has with him , the greater we may conclude is his distance from home . Hence . Jesus of Nazareth , who alone in history has affirmed the , essential divinity of man , not us a dogma but as a practical truth pregnant , with incalculable consequences to the kingdoms of this world , staggered the fairest pretenders hy his searching criticism . On one occasion , we find a young man adorned with every moral excellency fitted to attract tho lovo of Jesus , presenting himself before him with a view to ascertain how he should achieve everlasting life . Jesus told him to sell all that he had , or to abandon alibis possessions , and follow him . But the youth drew back sorrowful , because his possessions were very great . Whereupon the Christ uttered bis famous reflection upon the difficulty those who wen ; rich must encounter in entering the divine kingdom .
" Clearly thoy who stop in the hitter hero will be grievously mistaken . Tbey who see no riches more dangerous than money , have yet to learn the alphabet of Christianity . It is not our pecuniary possessions but our moral ones chiefly , that play tho traitor to our manhood . When I stand remarkably well with my fellows for piety and good morals , it is extremely hard for me to believe that tho divine life will not pay a greater deference to me than to one who is completely destitute of such standing . But it is a great mistake , a mistake fatal to true manhood . Doubtless I deserve greatly better at tho hands of society , of society us at present constituted , than my antagonist , because I support all her institutions . And society _mutually gives me my deserts , pronounces me an eminentl y good man . But if I thereupon suppose that this moral wealth of mine , extremely valuable , as it may be for the maintenance of an imperfect social condition , is going to further my upward success , is going to _tf ivo me any God-ward advantage over thieves and harlotH , I simply mistake a fundamental feature of the divino perfection , which is to be thankful for nothing . Tho Deity gives us all tilings in giving Himself to ua , in giving us u selfhood , and hence Ho takes it as a doubtful compliment when any
An Ameltlcan Thin Keit.. Lectures And Mi...
one attempts to eke out that gift , or make it more resplendent b y the c ontrast of another ' s natural or moral infirmity . " The socialism he rather hints at than proclaims , is of a religious character , which would demand more space than we can afford to get forth intelligibly ; let us rather glance at the way lie disposes of the " envy " argument . " The source of envy is always arbitrary privilege . It is always inflamed W some purely conventional superiority allowed one person over others . You never envy the power or genius of another ; you envy him some special outward advantage or privilege he enjoys .
" In a true society or fellowship among men , then , envy would be impossible , because no arbitrary distinctions , no such thing as exclusive privilege , in which alone envy has its source , would exist . > Why would not these things exist ? Because a true society , a society scientifically organized , would confer no unequal property , no exclusive privilege upon its subjects . That is te say , a true societywould guarantee to every man , woman , and child , for the whole term of his natural life , food , clothing , shelter , and the opportunities of an education adapted to bis tastes _; leaving all the distinction , he might achieve to _hiniselfj to his own _genius freely influencing the homage of his fellow men . Where society observed this wisdom , all envy would at once disappear . Its provender would be cut off . He .
move the incitements it now finds in privilege , in arbitrary advantage , and you would no more see one man envious of another than you now see the nose envious of the ear , or the hand envious of the brain . In short let genius become the hierarchical principle , and constitute the sole measure of one ' s social distinction ; and society would instantly become orderly . For genius ( by which term all along you observe I mean nothing technical in man , but simply his power of ideal action , his faculty of acting without reference either to passion or appetite , and solely with reference to the infinite beauty , the infinite goodness and truth , which animates his soul ) constitutes the real presence of God in man , and all men therefore acknowledge it with a spontaneous devotion . "
We will conclude with one more passage : — " A great dread besets the European mind , lest the people , in case of a succesful insurrection against authority , should pldnge into the maddest disorder , and sweep from the earth at one blow all the trophies and memorials of our past civilization . I cannot but believe that this fear vitally wrongs the popular instincts . There is doubtless a scum and froth of society attaching to both extremes , rich and poor alike , which is prone to every excess ; but this would instantly disappear the moment that the true substantial manhood of both sides should be allowed tb flow
together in loving fraternity , by the destruction of the puny prejudices which now divide them . This scum , this froth , grows on either side out of this unhappy division . It attests the attrition of two forces which are essentially one and should know therefore no divided interests . It strikes me consequently that in any decisive uprising of the people , both sides alike ' would instantly unite to rid themselves of this factitious and disorderly element . The European revolution of 1848 indeed fully justified this prevision . The thief , or the destructionist of whatever sort , when refractory to counsel , was instantly shot down to show that the will of the people when freely expressed is the will of God , and tolerates no lower
righteousness . " But it seems to ine that there can be no just apprehension of disorder in regard to tbe great mass of mankind , whether rich or poor . Property is universally felt to be a prime monument and measure of man ' s essential divinity , marking the extent of his conquest of nature . It is so much clear gain for mankind , so much actual advance upon primeval chaos and night . It is indeed very unscientifically distributed as yet , distributed in such a manner as to provoke incessant vice and crime : but this is because the symbol still absorbs the regard which is due only to the substance . Man ' s true proprium or property is his selfhood , is God within him , in other words , the inseparable fountain of his life . His natural proprium or
apparent selfhood is simply a basis for the due manifestation of this essential one . Hence when human fellowship or society is perfect , our natural or external proprium will be commensurate with our inward or divine one ; that is to say , the whole earth with all the resources of society will be the equal heritage of every man . Now property as a symbol or type is bound of course to obey the law of its antitype : is bound , that is , to become more and more equally distributed amongst the grout mass of society . Hut clearly this is to be done only by the legislative app lication of scientific principles , and not by tho brutal dissipation of thc thing distributed . " We must reserve for a future article his Lectures on tho Old and New Theology .
Ar01803
Are The Staks Inhabited ? Flectricity An...
ARE THE STAKS INHABITED ? Flectricity and the Electric Telegraph ; to which is added , Tho Chemistry of tho Stars . By Dr . George AVilson . ( Th ° Traveller ' s Library . ) Longman and Uo . If tho wisest of ancient philosophers could but take up this little volume , and understand its two essays ( an Jf as immense in regard to intellectual distance as to distance in time ) , he would marvel indeed at tho
development of science in this " our wondrous mother age , " and would recognise tho truth contained in the noble lines" For I doubt not through the ages one increasing purpose runs , And the thoughts of men are widened by the process of the suns . " Tho . Electric 'Telegraph , tho wonder of applied Hcience , and the Chemistry of the Stars , one of the wonders of tho inquisitorial intellect piercing into the dim remotenesses of space ! Hut our present object , is not to picture the elevated eyebrows of ancient philosophy . We wish to call attention to two nopulur and interesting CH . sti . ys _, and more especially to that ono which undertakes to answer the question of thc universality ol organic life . Dr . Georgo Wilson is an eloquent and thoughtful writer , and his essay on the Electric Telegraph , which created a sensation on its iirst appearance in the Edinburgh Review , will bo perhaps more generally appreciated than his essay on tho Chemistry of . the Stars ( somewhat loosely named ) , which we now propose to notice .
It is difficult for man to relinquish the old notion of the universe being made subordinate to him , and made wholly for him . When science know little more of the stars than that they were the gaslights as well as tho " poetry of heaven , " this notion of supremacy obtained ready credence . When science brou ght its telescopic revelations to show th at
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Aug. 14, 1852, page 18, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_14081852/page/18/
-