On this page
- Departments (2)
-
Text (13)
-
Mat 19,1855. J TEE &EAJPE&. #$7
-
the .duties he had to perform. The langu...
-
We find the following in a contemporary:...
-
A letter from St'. Petersburg, dated the...
-
A despatch from Lord Ituglan, dated tho ...
-
NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS. EREATtnu: in ...
-
During the Session tlf Parliament it is ...
-
c Jmmbt x.
-
ir SATURDAY, MAY 19, 1855.
-
^ttlil-Mnirj.
-
There is nothing so revolutionary, becau...
-
NEITHER PEACE NOR WAR. The intrigues for...
-
THE HOUSE OF PEERESSES. By what right do...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Mat 19,1855. J Tee &Eajpe&. #$7
Mat 19 , 1855 . J TEE & EAJPE & . #$ 7
The .Duties He Had To Perform. The Langu...
the . duties he had to perform . The language in yrtncl the letters were addressed to him , demanding a contradiction , was such as to make him think that he ¦ was not hound to reply to thenvespecially as'they had -been published in the newspapers . He could assert that he had said nothing with respect to Captain Christie which could riot be morally justified . Sir J . Pakington expressed his regret at the course pursued by Mr . ! Layard , and at his loose mode of making icharges against public servants . He thought that . that gentleman should manfully have . admitted . that he had been mistaken . Mr . Bright declared that he thought Mr . Layard was fully justified in stating that Captain Christie was unfit for his duty . He might easily have been ^ mistaken in Captain Christie ' s age , and if Mr . JLayard had formally and ceremoniously come down to the House to contradict such a statement , he would have been received with shouts of laughter . Sir Jambs Geaham said that a debt of justice was due to the memory of a gallant man and to his relatives . Captain Christie was a man of high character whose competency was finst called in question by Mr . Xayard . He feared that he himself had yielded too much to clamour in ordering a Commission of Inquiry into Captain "Christie ' s conduct . He had , however , thought it better to submit his conduct to bis brother officers rather than to the Sebastopol Committee . He feared that this matter had broken the heart of Captain Christie . He could not think that Mr . Layard was justified in saying that the letters contradicting his statements were offensive simply on account of such contradictions . Mr . Roebuck , could not call Mr . Layard ' s stated ments charges against Captain Christie . Even Sir J . Graham had found it necessary to supersede that officer , and if Captain Christie had died brokenhearted it was because he was superseded and ordered to be tried by a court-martial—both the doing of Sir J . Graham , and with which Mr . ILayard had nothing to do . He did not think that Mr . Layard ' s conduct deserved the censure'Of the House Admiral Berkele y said that Captain Christie had himself demanded a court-jnartial , and his death was not caused by any steps taken by Sir J . Graham . The subject then dropped . THE POLISH LEGION . Mr . Otway inquired if certain Poles who had been sent to the Crimea were to be enlisted in the Foreign Legion , or to be enrolled under their national standard ? Lord Palmerston replied that : they were to be enrolled in a special corps in the Turkish service . The adjourned debate on the Scottish Education Bill was then proceeded with . The position in whicli the bill stood was this . On the motion for going into committee , an amendment was made by Mr . C . Bruce on a former evening that the bill should be divided into two parts , so that the principle of throwing open the parochial schools , and taking them from under the immediate control of the Established Church , while it was applied to the towns should not be applicable to the rural districts . On this a long debate ensued , confined almost wholly to'tlie Scotch members . The House divided . For going into committee , 149 ; against it , 142 : majority , 7 . The other business was disposed of , and the ' House adjourned at one o ' clock .
i ^ iWB ^ H ^ M ^ B ^ M ^ i " ^^^^"""^^ ^*^""" ¦ ' ' ^^¦¦ ^ ¦¦ ^ ¦ ¦ ¦ ^ 1 1 TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION TO ; « mjt JLeafcet . " ' , J ? oraHalf-Year ... ; . * .. .. £ 0 13 0 I To be remitted in advance . x ijgj" Money Orders should be drawn upon the Stbaut ' Branch Office , and be made payable to Mr . Albjbed JE Gallowat , at No . 154 , Strand .
We Find The Following In A Contemporary:...
We find the following in a contemporary : — " Vienna , Thursday . " Austria has Agreed with the Western Powers on an utimatis $ imum to be presented to Russia . If this decidedly final attempt for peace should fail , Austria promises that she really will assume a decided attitude . " A fresh circular from Count Nesselrode has arrived here . It merely consists of a full narrative of the late negotiations—of course drawn up in a Russian sense . "
A Letter From St'. Petersburg, Dated The...
A letter from St ' . Petersburg , dated the 10 th , from a high mercantile house , gives a deplorable account of the pressure on all classes in that capital . Business was comparatively at an end , and the continuance of the present state of things was regarded with tho greatest dread in all quarters .
A Despatch From Lord Ituglan, Dated Tho ...
A despatch from Lord Ituglan , dated tho 5 th , was published last night . Tho only news of importanco contained \ n it is tho statement that " tho enemy still appear to bo collecting troops upon tho high ground on tho opposite * - sido of tho Tchernaya , in tho neighbourhood of Sebastopol , and convoj's ; are constantly seen moving in that direction . " The doatliH of Lieutenants Carter , Curtis , and White , ' arc mentioned ; and tho remainder of " tho do- i Bputch" refers to the operations of tho French . j
Notices To Correspondents. Ereattnu: In ...
NOTICES TO CORRESPONDENTS . EREATtnu : in oue Last . —Page 453 , 1 st columii , 2 nd line from top , for Madame Rezzolis jj vread Madame JFeezzotmx
During The Session Tlf Parliament It Is ...
During the Session tlf Parliament it is often-impossible to . find room for correspondence , even the briefest . No notice can be taken of anonymous communications "Whatever is intended for insertion must be authenticated by the name and address of the writer ; not necessarily for publication , but as a guarantee of his good faith . Communications should always be legibly written , and on one side of the paper only . If long , it increases the difficulty of finding space for them . "We cannot undertake to return rejected communications .
C Jmmbt X.
c Jmmbt x .
Ir Saturday, May 19, 1855.
ir SATURDAY , MAY 19 , 1855 .
^Ttlil-Mnirj.
^ ttlil-Mnirj .
There Is Nothing So Revolutionary, Becau...
There is nothing so revolutionary , because tttereis nothing so unnatural and convulsive , as the strain to keep things fixed when all the world is by the very law oi its creation in eternal progress . —Jte . Abkoxd
Neither Peace Nor War. The Intrigues For...
NEITHER PEACE NOR WAR . The intrigues for peace which may be detected in the hesitations of the English Government may be explained by the fact that it has been disappointed or , more strictly , undeceived . Its alliances are still precarious ; its military operations not yet successfulr To desist from the war now would be to acknowledge its futility , and the improvidence of the nation which began it with defiance and exultation . Tranquillity would be restored , taxes mitigated , society cheered , and our legislators privileged to hilarity ; but the inevitable questions would be—Why did we commence the struggle ? Why have we lavished the lives of twenty thousand men ? Did we make war on a scale so vast simply to regain the peace we had abandoned ? If it be unnecessary to force terms upon Russia , if it be wiser to content ourselves with nominal guarantees , so framed as to consult her immeasurable pride , the only human regret must be that we did not know all this before losing an army , and exposiug our military weakness . Unless the objects of the war be so important that they must be pursued while we have strength to contend for them , tho Eastern expedition was a vanity and a crime . Even now , before an irresistible current bears the nation with it , let us manfully ask ourselves . whether wo are disdaining an ignomiuious peace to pursue an aimless war . Let us discover whether any of ourminiateus can categorically define tho purpose of the conflict , that wo may understand how by beating the Russians in the field wo can accomplish appreciable and distinct l'esults . A statesman ' s treaty might bo a farce ; but a statesman ' s war , to tear out tho bowels of the nation for the sake of a diplomatic punctilio , more worthless than John Zisca ' s skin , would bo a deplorable extravagance , insulting to justice , aud hateful to history . If tho war , with its nameless miseries , is to bo prolonged , let us hoar of some better objects than a rivalry with Russian famo in Asia , a dubious prestigo among the mock courts of Germany , or a Hecurity for Na . po . leoinsm in Franco . Wo may bo siiro that , unless our purposes arc fixed , ten yoai \ s of conflict will not be more glorious than one . It ia time ,
therefore , sin . ee we stand on . the ^ erge of neutral ground between an incalculable extension of the war and an ephemeral ^ paxaficatiep , to know what palpable objects we ' naye in , viejw and whether they are worth the blood of our armies . Sooner or later a-nation . pays for its follies as well as for its crimes . We do not hesitate to say that a war with Russia , on the plea of European dangers , was just and necessary ; but we wish to know the intentions of its swaggering supporters . Is the English Government fighting only to win ? Is the press blustering because to bluster is popular ? Is the nation paying , bleeding , and bottle-holding in a generous , but vague and sentimental , frenzy ? Turkey trembles under every stroke of the war . Austria is importuned to render political results in Europe impossible . Prance is encouraged to make efforts 3 n Dehalf of its oppressor , and "England is warned that it maylose reputation in Tartar tents and Persian villages . We would gladly . see these ideas released from their confusion , that some logical sequence might be established between the deadly sufferings of the Crimean enterprise , and the consequences that are . anticipated when Sebastopol is captured and Russia coerced . Plainly , the notion is abhorrent to reason and . good feeling that this nation is to
grapple in savage hatred with Russia and to be agonised by war during a succession of years , if at the close it is to accept terms not more important to itself or to Europe than those it is now rejecting and deriding-. To families whose hopes and affections are broken for ever , nothing can be more loathsome than the pedantic refinements of that policy for which their fathers , sons , or friends have perished in the hospital or the field . To check the principle of conquest which is represented by Russia — - to shatter the main bulwark of despotism in Europeto disgrace absolutism by defeating itto open paths for the advance of a purer civilisation and more rational principles of society , would indeed be a result worth many sacrifices . The exhaustion of Russia in a political Avar might strike away the central pillars of that fabric of misrule which overshadows tho Old World ; and , so far as the war transcends diplomacy , it is intelligible and justifiable . We doubt not this is the spirit in which the nation acts ; but it is to be feared that the nation and its government are not at one in principles of action . Is it unreasonable to desire some explanation before we are committed to calamities without compensations ?
The debates next week on the peace motions in the Lords and Commons , ought to elicit this explanation . Lord Geet and the Manchester party have defined their notion of a settlement with Russia . Lord Palmeeston will tell us what he does not consider acceptable terms . But will any one set forth , courageously , the proper objects of tho war ? How long shall Austria stop tho way ?
The House Of Peeresses. By What Right Do...
THE HOUSE OF PEERESSES . By what right do the Peers interfere in tho legislation of thia country ? They once constituted an " order" in the State ; they had hold of the land in their iron grasp , deriving their possession from the divine authority ot the Xing , who transmitted his right to them upon condition that they returned the value in hi . s chief requirement—military service . Lon" - iifier that time , they retained tho land , ami with that grip they posaesBed tho power of letting out the use of the soil , of returning memberi 7 of Parliament through tho influence which they had over tho Commons , besides hereditary right to of lice , and much accumulated wealth . Tho Reform Bill broke upon
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 19, 1855, page 11, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_19051855/page/11/
-