On this page
-
Text (4)
-
November 22,1856.] THE LEADER. 1117
-
( ( ^ j - ] , \ ( THE UNCOlSrVTCTED. A Q...
-
'¦ [ 5 j 1 j r ' ' , 3 " 3 l - 1 - :1 f ...
-
'JUDGEMENTS'—AND WANT OF JUDG-¦ ¦¦: ; ¦ ...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
The Dublin Murder. A Most Remarkable Mur...
quaintance ? Let us suppose the case . He knocks , and asks admittance . The voice is known . He enters , and engages the cashier in parley . Mr . IiiTTMB was not a firm man ; even "where the intruders into his office were Jew pedlais he found it hard to get rid of them . He might not have liked , le might fear , the presence of this friend , who may have "been of any rank in life , from -the hum- blest man known to him up to the highest in rank among his friends . But he was not the man to tell the intruder to go away , Perhaps he indicated his unwillingness to be disturbed by returning to his work , and then felt on his head that stunning blow which crushed him down , and left Mm a senseless victim for repeated wounds . "We have in- dicated above the defects of the newspaper reports , and of the coroner ' s inquiry- 3 & or instance , tlie dimensions of the room are not stated , nor the distance between Mr- Littlie' s chair and the counter- —but we may guess the latter , when we find that " a large table '' was between them . The instrument with ( which , in all likelihood , the murder was effected , has been found—it is a heavy ham- ^ mer , with a . handle eighteen inches long . j The Dublin police haveniore than once - signally failed in detecting secret crimes . ] They now appear to liunt up eagerly some , strangers who were seen about the office : they should first quietly exhaust suspicions ( against every one who knew Mr- Littzle , knew the office , and knew the business habits of the casliier .
November 22,1856.] The Leader. 1117
November 22 , 1856 . ] THE LEADER . 1117
( ( ^ J - ] , \ ( The Uncolsrvtcted. A Q...
\ THE UNCOlSrVTCTED . A QBE at light lias burst upon us . Weunderstand the spirit of the age better than we did a few hours since . Mr . Little has been murdered , says the Dablin Protestant Institution , because the Government has neglected its duty . This is indeed an alarming riddle . "Why should the unoffending 1 / tttxe be slain because the Government has done something amiss ? It implies tha . t the Government of the country is in some way or other pledged on the side of those who have destroyed Little . It implies , too , that the Dublin Protestants are in the secret , and know the motives of the vengeance . There is evidently a connexion between the murderer , the Dublin Protestants , and tlie Government , who are all of a story . Now this would be simply an insoluble riddle if we had not other facts to elucidate it . The number of proceedings called frauds lias become so considerable , and is as yet so evidently unexhausted , that we are driven to ask for the statistics of the population engaged in such transactions . The vast number of persons in some kind of office , the distinguished gentlemen in commerce , persons of distinction in fashionable neighbourhoods , and eminent for their religious and charitable qualities , who accidentally deviate into our criminal courts 3 challenges inspection by Mr . Mon . If the Uncou-vieted of . the class bear a fair proportion to the convicted , their name is Legion , antV we must further ask , what , proportion the TJiiconvicted bear to the guiltless ? The answer suggested throws considerable light upon the state of parties and of politics . We observe that the Unconvicted interest has its representatives in all places of power and influence : has its nobles and its members of Parliament ; it has posted its agencies amongst the directors of our great managing companies , amongst the clerks ; and , like Russia , it has a wide-spread agency throughout all classes of society . We suspect that it is not unrepresented even in the church or the aneeting-house . We have formerly been perplexed to know how it is that there is annually such a gigantic mass of bankruptcy , fraudulent bankruptcy , which takes property out of the hands of the Guiltless to enrich the Uncoil * victed . Again , how is it that the garotter is wandering about the streets unrestrained ? How is it that the "burglar can mark the house tht \ t he desires , and appropriate its contents , without hindrance ) ? The whole ot this perplexity is explained by the suggestive complaints of tlio Dublin Protestants . Evidently , there is a solidarity of interests hostile to the harmless . The aggressive x > opulatiou , Convicted and Unconvicted , i mmensely outnumbers us . If you go to an evening party at the West End , you niay . be tolerably certain that there is a largo infusion of the
Unconvicted , perliaps a majority . Go into church , and count the Uedpaths , the -Kents , the Hob - sons , who have not yet been found out . \ Novr these persons have influence with constituencies ; they place their Sadlhirs in the House of Commons ; they have placed their ' Honourable Mr . ' in the public offices ; and they carry the election of their directors on railways . They are all governed by one concentrated purpose—pelf taken from us , the innocent , and self-protection for themselves . Their business is to look after the moneysafe which is going along the railway journey ; and what care they for passengers and collisions ? "With this , worse than Russian preponderancy in the State , are we to wonder that the garotter or the burglar is favourably regarded / by the policeman , who averts his eye , if he does not avert himself ? J \ ow , then , we understand how it is that the House of Commons passes laws to prevent children being taken out of Mr . Fagin's school ; now we understand how it is that laws are ' maintained , ostensibly for the protection of ' credit , but really for fructifying in these immense bankruptcies , so profitable to the predominant interest . "We see it all . It is this solidarity of interest among the Unconvicted , that enormous class , which explains all the apparent solecisms and inconsistencies of our administration and legislation . The Uneonvicted is in the majority , and it is able to arrauge laws convenient to itself ; leaving us , the unsuspecting minority , to get along as we may , among defaulters , directors , burglars , honourables , embezzlers , members of Parliament , garotters , clergymen , pickpockets , and officials . :
'¦ [ 5 J 1 J R ' ' , 3 " 3 L - 1 - :1 F ...
'¦ [ 5 j 1 j ' ' , 3 " 3 l - 1 - : 1 f s f 0 ? THE TTALEWSKI ESTATES . Tele Observer recently announced that the Czar Alexandeb , II ., appreciating the services rendered to Russia during the late war by Count Wa : lewski , had restored the Polish estates of the family , confiscated after the events of 1831 . It is well ¦ known that M . Walewski , now a Minister of the Empire , was then ah officer on the staff of the insurrectionary Polish army . The Times repeated , in emphatic type , the statement of the Observer . Immediately the Paris JDcbats and Consiitutionnel circulated a contradictory sneer , concluding with these words : — M . Walewski never possessed any property in Poland , nor has the Russian Government ever confiscated any possessions telonging to his family . Thus do the assertions of the Observer and tlie Times , which we have no language to qualify , fall of themselves to the ground . "We have nothing to do with the assertion that M . Walewski was , during the recent wax , a servitor of the Russian Government . His policy may be construed in that sense , or it may not . But the two privileged French journals have published that which is distinctly , unmistakably , and'thoroughly incorrect . The Hussian G-overnment did confiscate the estates of the "Wai-ewski family . Here is the notification contained in tlie number of the official llusaian organ , the Tygodnik PeterslursJci ( published at St . Petersburg weekly ) of September 12 ( 24 ) 1844 < : — A decree of the Council of Administration of Poland , passed in the month of July , 1844 , says : — " Whereas , Alexander Count Walewski , after having , on a decree presented in 1833 , obtained an amnesty , has Hot taken advantage thoreof , horeliy is decreed the confiscation of his goods , also the inscription in the hypothecation register , to the credit of the State , of the titles of the property in stock pertaining to the aforesaid Walowski . " " If , " says the Belgian National , " the Defate and the Constitutionnclave particular on the point , we will give the name of an important domain that was confiscated . '' Yet the denials of the Constiticiionnel and tho Debats were communicated . ' What if tho Moniteur be as false when it contradicts ita semi-official contemporary ? and what if the Nord should venture to affirm that no such decree exists in the Itusaian archives ?
1 r c i "V r i t i t e c i c \ 3 i 1 The Belgian National remarks , justly , " may judge , from this new example > how much confidence should be placed in the ' communicated' paragraphs of the journals devoted to ' IS .. "Waiewski . " But no French newspaper will be allowed to reprint the ukase ; so that the French public will be left to believe that " the Hussian Government never confiscated any property belonging to the family . " The statement that the family did lose estates in this manner , las been set down as originating in ignorance and propagated by malice . No respectable journal in this country , liowever , approved the ridiculous [ violence of the Constitutionnel . We have yet to learn whether "we may congratulate the house of "Walewskx upon the resumption of its ancient domains .
'Judgements'—And Want Of Judg-¦ ¦¦: ; ¦ ...
' JUDGEMENTS' —AND WANT OF JUDG-¦ ¦¦ : ; ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦; . ; . ¦;¦ ¦ - ¦ ; MEN . T . " : ¦ ' . - . . ; .. - .: ¦ Me . Joseph Cowen has told us the character of that ' infidel institution . ' that Iiord ! Ra .-VEifswoitTii denounced . It will be perceived that the institution takes in the Leader , which Lord Ravens worth's friends probably class among the infidel publications ; that is , it does not support the party which uses calumny ,, misrepresentation , and the lecture-hall of one institution for the purpose of getting up a rival institution , as a means of ingratiating a bigoted creed with the honest working classes of a manufacturing town . " We need not , however , vindicate the character of our own j ournal ; vre leave that question to be settled between the Ua . ven"swobth party of clerical gentlemen , and the many clergymen who are our own regular subscribers . 3 n facfc , we regard the paroxysm of agitation among the so-called religious faction just tit present , with compassion ; we perceive the reasons for their distress , and tlie excesses into which it leads them . The clerical prophet has discovered in . Ireland the reason for "the foul and fiendish murder of the late Mr . Samuel G-eorge Little , " and the Dublin Protestant Institution has adopted the theory in a formal resolution . The reason is : — That our rulers , in their blind obstinacy , have carried out a policy for the last quarter of a century calculated to impede the coiirso of God ' s truth in the land , to darken the hearts of men , and propagate a spirit of contempt for oil laws , divine and social , throughout society in general . This reminds us of the discovery of Monsiguore Tji . vnzoni , that Victor Emmanuel was chastised for schismatic conduct in secu- « ' larizing the property of the Church , by the death of bis lather , his brother , and his wife , in rapid succession . 1 Tho Dublin Protestant Institution resolved " a prayer" " that Ho will not deprive the country of all consular wisdom . " What this means wo do not know ; but we know that L Ml * . Disraeli , who has had friendly rela-¦ tions with the Dublin . Protestants , formerly
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Nov. 22, 1856, page 13, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_22111856/page/13/
-