On this page
-
Text (4)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Eurasians especially love to be initiated into the " mysteries of iParis , '' as they are understood and exhibited at Chandernagore . And while this little town is a perfect nuisance to the British authorities , it is not of the slightest value or importance to the French Government- Should war ever again break out—may . propitious deities avert the omen . ' —between the Powers now so happily allied , Chandernagore would behold St . Geobgb ' s banner floating over its walls
within twenty-four hours after the intelligence had reached Fort "William . Nor is it of any service to the revenues of France , for the expenses of its government exceed its incomings from every source . It is , therefore , a permissible hint that advantage might be taken of the cordial feeling now existing between the two nations to obtain the transfer of Chandernagore for a pecuniary
or other consideration . Holland and Denmark were readily induced to concede their respective settlements , and we cannot doubt that the French would courteously follow their example . There can be no question as to the hearty co-operation to be expected from the Honourable East India Company in bringing About such a desirable result , and in any case it is a matter well worthy of the serious " attention of Government .
Untitled Article
WIFE AND NO WIFE . A PO 8 T 80 BTPT to our paper on Mrs . Norton ' s pamphlet is suggested by a new pamphlet in the case of Mrs . Tax , bot . * As frequently happens in this class of cases , justice is Outraged in , opposite ways . Here is Mrs . Norton , who desires to be divorced from her husband ; and she would have been so if she had been willing to admit as true an accusation of conduct which she regards as guilt . If she would confess herself degraded in her
own eyes she might be free . It was indeed requisite that she should acknowledge an accomplice in an old friend—the Prime Minister of this country . Not having been proved to have committed a breach of the law , her character being at least judicially free from any taint , she remains under slavery to the man , who accused her . It so happened that the evidence brought against Mrs . Norton was of a kind which , if not true ,
must have been manufactured : it was judicially pronounced to bo untrue . But if the conspiracy against hei had been rather more criminal , then again she would have been free . There was in her case either an insufficient amount of offence against the law on her own part , or of successful conspiracy on the other aide ; and the result is , that she remains incapable of extricating herself from the bonds of a matrimony which she knows only in its disabilities .
The case of Mrs . Ta-l-dot is exactly the reverse . No reader , we presume , can have perused the pamphlets of Mr . Paget without rising from them conviuced that the stories respecting Mrs . Talbot ' s conduct were absolutely without foundation . The Ecclesiastical Oourt in Dublin , however , taking such one-Bided evidence as was produced bofore it ,
affirmed that she was guilty of the conduct ascribed to her . On the appeal , the leading judge in tho Court of Delegates , happening to fcake up the pleadings instead of the evidence , Pronounced that the judgment of tho Court Wow was correct ; and the Upper Court 4 dded another peculiarly logical tour deforce fa its grounds of judgment . " It has
declared that admissions made by Mrs . Tai / bot were occasioned by the ' wandering of a diseased imagination , not based upon reality , and as such should not be received by a court of justice , ' and has then quoted and relied upon them because they were sincere ; in other words , because she was herself deluded by her delusions ! " The result is , that Mrs . Talbot is divorced .
The law leaves Mrs . Norton undivided from her husband , but knowing marriage only in its disabilities . It leaves Mrs . Talbot divorced , but knowing divorce only in its disabilities ; and in this fate her husband shares . The manifest object of the divorce for him was to obtain another wife , and by that means the chance of an heir , who would intervene between himself and his nephew in the inheritance . By the fortune of Ecclesiastical Courts Mr . Talbot has arrived at a
divorce in that kind of tribunal . In doing so , however , he haa been necessarily compelled , as a matter of form , to display before the public the evidence upon which he relies ; and we can judge pretty well of its result if he should carry the case forward to the House of Lords ; who can alone complete the divorce civilly . " To that bar he must come , " says Mr . Paget , " if he means to clear away the stigma which your lordship ' s emphatic condemnation of his witnesses , as * infamous * and for some motive , neither * trutlitelling nor trustworthy , ' must otherwise affix upon his character . " He must bring the Rev . Mr . M'CIelland , and confront him with my brother and my self . He must bring
his brother-in-law , the Rev . Mr . Collie and his witnesses , Joseph O'Brien and Susan and Mary Benn He must bring Maria Mooney , to be again contradicted by Margaret Hall . He must bring Hester Keogh , to tell the arts that have been used to induce her to « swear false against her mistress ; ' again to ' refuse to belie her , as Halloran and Finnerty had done ; ' again to tell how , during that horrible night , her mistress ' protested her innocence ; ' again to give her emphatic testimony to the falsehood of the charges brought against her . He must bring the Rev . Mr . Kemmis , and his confederate Mrs . Tennant , alias Mrs . Trueman . He must himself appear , attended by his chosen servants , Michael Halloran , the convicted forger ! and Brien Finnerty , alias Dennis Defanz / S "
We can , as we have said , pretty well calculate beforehand the result of an appeal to the House of Lords . In the ineauwhile , though Mr . and Mrs . Talbot are divorced by the power of the Ecclesiastical Courts , they are undivoreed by the civil courts ; they are strangers to each other under the Ecclesiastical law , they are uiau and wife at common law ; they are single so far as relates to any comfort or aid to each other , they are bound in matrimony so far as relates to their incapacity for seeking companionhood elsewhere . Norton
The law , therefore , retains Mrs . in bondage to the husband whom she has left , and who has advertised her in the public newspapers—the law retaining hor in the boudagc because she is not guilty . It has pronounced Mrs . Talbot to be divorced on the kind of evidence that we have reviewed , and she is insane by consequence of the proceedings against her . Mr . Talbot , who desired freedom for the sake of a new chance that he might have an heir , is referred to the House of Lords with such evidence as we have seen .
Untitled Article
THE CONDUCT OF THE WAR . Wb have received from Brussels a copy of a pamphlet published at Geneva under the title of Second Memoir addressed to the Government of his Imperial Majesty Napoleon IH . y on the Expedition into the Crimea , ' and the Conduct of the War in the East . ISij a General Officer . In his seventh chapter tho writer recapitulates , under tho following neads , the blunders , military and diplomatic , committed hitherto in tho conduct of the war ; with special reference to tho responsibility of the Kmperor of the French , the prime author of tho Crimean expedition : — 1 . General adoption of the system of absolutist alliancoa in preference to alliancos with nationalities .
2 . Pursuit of the Austrian alliance . 3 . Ready consent to the conclusion of a special treaty between Austria and Turkey . 4 . Abandonment of the true theatre of war , the Danubian Principalities , the culminating point from which the "Western Powers should have directed their operations of ¦ war and of diplomacy . 5 . The idea of the Crimean expedition started by Austria , and accepted without reflection by the Allies . 6 . The conception of the plan of campaign due to the Emperor , unacquainted as a politician with operations of war , and particularly with the general state of facts existing in the East . 7 . The siege of Sebastopol by the southern side , and the winter campaign in the Russian territory .
8 . Selection of Generals of streetlights and skirmishes , destitute of notions of geography , topography , and ethnology , without experience of practical strategy , and without knowledge of la grande guerre ; relying on the bravery of their troops more than upon their own initiative . 9 . Pursuit of the Prusso-Germanic alliance without any compensation offered either to peoples , or to sovereigns . 10 . Systematically harsh demeanour towards the brave Piedmontese nation . 11 . Unreasonable pressure upon the Cabineta of Copenhagen and of Stockholm , without offer of guarantees for the future .
12 . Persistent rejection of the idea of an eventual re-establishment of Poland : as the vulnerable flank of Hussia , and a continental appui given to the three Scandinavian States , Denmark , Sweden , and Norway . 13 . Impolitic hostilities on the part of the combined fleets against the Finnish nationality , and useless violence against the Lapons and the Samoiedes : among other instances , the bombardment of Kola , 68 . lat . N . 14 . Majestic impotence of the naval campaign in the Baltic , and in the Gulfs of Bothnia and Finland . 15 . Unlucky publication of an obituary article on the Czar Nicholas at the moment of the reopening of the negotiations on the basis of the guarantees accepted by Alexander II .
16- Publication of the military article of the Momteur , on the Crimean expedition , discouraging to the officers of the" army . 17 . Publication of the diplomatic article of the Moniteur , on the negotiations , an article subservient to
Austrian interests . 18 . Bombardment of Sebastopol from the 9 th to tie 27 th of April , without forces sufficient to risk an assault . — We have not space this week to enter into anydetailed examination of these criticisms . There is more than one of them in -which many of our political readers may be disposed , partially at feast , to concur ; there are others in direct opposition to the facts as they are generally known
to political circles in London . We allude more particularly to the fifth charge , " The idea of the Crimean expedition started by Austria . " This seems a little inconsistent with the leading statement of the first " Memoir , " repeated with emphasis in the second , that to the Emperor of the French alone was due the design of the Crimean expedition : a statement now universally accepted , and never officially denied .
On the other hand , the generally accepted fact is , that Austria objected last autumn to the Crimean expedition , because it carried off those forces which she desired to support herself in case of actual collision with Russia . It is even affirmed that , to prevent that removal of support , Austria offered to lead an advance into Bessarabia , thus anticipating by some months the tardy J' cry of insubordination against diplomatic necessities , " which , according to the " Memoir , " was only extorted from the emotion of the Emperor of tho French by the disasters of Inkerman , when he assured his army that a powerful diversion was " about to be effected in Bessarabia . " _
The fact that Austria did make some such offer seems to be indicated by the argument of our own Ministers against an advance into Bessarabia , on the ground thtit it would remove the British force from their legitimate base of operations—the sea . INow , considering the position which the English force would then have held in conjunction with the French , the Turkish , and the Austrian forces , this argument appears weak enough ; but the * „__« . i " ........ — . 1 In i >» ifY « r <» n ^ fi to tllO put forward in reference to uio
same argument Austrian invitation , almost confirms the statement that such an invitation was ™*<* e- J . " fact reminds us of what should never be ^; g ottc "' that tve have at no time had a st ( l [ V ^{ tr [ ! t Austrian case . Wo « 1 «> pof know tho Auatpmn official ?> er contra to the statements of oui own SHniliC , nor i . it possible to tell what mflujncg the rejection of Austrian proposals , not ^ « ° < J in Lord John Russell * oonvpnwtaomj may have had in causing tho successive change in the
Untitled Article
JrrLir 21 , 1855 . ] THE LEADER . 697
Untitled Article
JT VTamiotu . Tam » ot .- —A Letter to tho Hon . Justice Vprrona . By John Pngot , E « u . ., of the Middle Temple , giuxiater-fct-Law . With a Report of the Judgment of the JH gk Court of Delegates , delivered on June 14 , 1856 . " **»« eta : Thoraaa Blonkarn , Law Bookseller , 29 , Bellied , Lincoln ' * Inn . 1855 .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), July 21, 1855, page 697, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2100/page/13/
-