On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
tion , Dr . C . has not bettered his case ; for the Reviewer expressly declares alcohol to be poison in large doses ( wh ich is all that toxicologists maintain ) , but that in small doses it is food ; and he shows conversely that all food becomes poison , in excess . But Dr . Carpenter persists in confounding excess with moderation—persists , in spite of evidence , in attributing to small doses what is true only of large doses , and thus claims the toxicologists as authority for his assertion that alcohol is essentially a poison . As for our anonymous selves , we admit the terrible and obvious fact of wearing a mask , " but we cannot comprehend how the removal of that mask would suddenly change Dr . Carpenter ' s blunders into accuracies , or his misconceptions into clear conceptions . He endeavours to meet our exposure by disavowing the report of his speech at Exeter-hall , which , of course , may have inaccurately reported his words ; but we find from the Bristol Temperance Herald , of December 1 , that he has , in the Scottish
Review , written an article in reply to his Reviewer , and in this article there is the very passage , word for word , which we quoted last week as containing a strange misconception of the Reviewer ' s statement , and very -serious blunders by way of illustration . Will the removal of our mask alter these things ?
Untitled Article
MACAULAY'S FIRST AND SECOND VOLUMES . JUacaulay ' s First and Second Volumes . A Retrospective Keview . Having taken in hand to write a history of the British nation from the reign of James I ., Mr . Macaulay commences his monumental work by a passing allusion to the condition of the island under its Roman conquerors . He glances at the very ephemeral consequences of that occupation of Britain , inasmuch as neither the language , the religion , nor the laws of the aboriginal people were sensibly , or permanently , affected . The Saxon irruption was a matter of far greater moment . Thence may be dated the constitutional liberty and maritime supremacy of England . For , though it may not be strictly and historically true that the Parliament is merely a modification or amendment of the ancient Witenagemote , there can be no doubt that the
spirit of freedom which engendered the one , was accessory to the other . But the greatest benefit conferred upon Britain during the Saxon domination , came from beyond the seas , from the fallen capital of her former rulers . Rome , which for so many centuries had commissioned her armed legions to conquer and subdue the world , now sent forth her missionaries to preach the gospel of peace and brotherly love , and tn bring mankind to an humble knowledge of their Redeemer and Him crucified . The ignorant barbarians listened with awestruck credulity to those meek and earnest men , who dared to set themselves in opposition to the strongest passions of human natureand , listening , they were converted . It may be that the Church had already degenerated from the standard proposed by the apostles and early fathers , and that both intellectual subtleties and gross materialism had crept in . But had the Church
been ten times more degenerate , the exchange of idolatry for even a coarse form of Christianity would still have proved an inestimable blessing . The very dissensions that impaired the unity and superficial beauty of the fabric , inspired an active vitality and an earnestness which , in these our days , would be denounced as hypocrisy , or derided as maudlin enthusiasm . By the humbler classes of society the " glad tidings " were especially welcomed as the means of alleviating their present lot , and as holding out the promise of a better state hereafter . Temporarily , a shield was interposed between them and their oppressors , for the jwroudest Eorls did homage to the sacred character of churchmen j and , from a spiritual point of view , they looked forward to the hour when all men shall be equal , and all susceptible of happiness .
Of the Danish incursions it is needless to speak , save as the forerunners o an event which , more than all others , has influenced the history of our nation . It is matter of public fame , bow those fierce pirates from the Baltic , not only imposed a brief dynasty upon the throne of England , but also wrested from a feeble sovereign of France one of his fairest provinces . 'Twere idle to tell how those Franeised Northmen , availing themselves of the unsettled state of the island of Britain , crossed the narrow channel , vanquished the Saxons at Hastings , and placed their bastard captain on the throne . Never was conquest more complete . The Normans alone were men . The Saxons were degraded to beasts of burden—animals for gift or purchase ; hewers of wood and drawers of water . The land , with its productions , its inhabitants and cultivators , was parcelled out among the victors . The name of " Englishman " became a term of reproach . He was a mere chattel ; he could not even possess himself . Here again the clergy intervened ; and , asserting the common brotherhood of mankind , oftentimes stayed the hasty wrath of the chafing barons . Many a dying lord listened , with contrition , to the whispered accents of the bending monk , and
Every vassal of his banner , Every serf born to hiu manor , All those wrongod and wretched creatures , By his hand were freed again . But , with all their faults , those Normans were a grand old race . War and the chase were their objects of life , their normal avocation , their mission ; Jw Jfi mmstreVs song their chief recreation . No rude wassailers were 8 v 2 L If ? K ? m T- *?? 10 * the 1 S 8 ht and gladsome wines of sunny Prance , but they turned in disgust from the heavy draughts of beer and metheglm , and the habitual excess of British and Saxon churls England however , mj . no longer the land of Englishmen . Aliens in blooS and speech lorded it in the town the hamlet , the forest , and the champaign , and deemed their conquered villains scarce meet to follow them to the field The Kings of England were at the same time vassals of France , and this anomalous position for four centuries involved the two kingdoms in a constant state of mutual hostility . Fortunately for the independence of this island , there arose a weak , treacherous , and selfishly ambitious monarch who threatened alike the privileges of the nobility and the security o traders . Then the Normans and the Saxons for the first time came together Community of danger united them in a holy league , and the foundation , not
only of English liberty , but of the English nation , was laid at Runnymede . By degrees intermarriages became more frequent , and the two races gradually lapsing into one , formed the noblest people in the world . There was no longer any possibility of the annexation of England as an appanage of the French crown . A nationality now existed , against which no foreign power has for a moment prevailed . French wars then grew to be popular , and the sturdy yeomen stepped forward with bow and hill to do battle against the steel-clad chivalry of France . They fought and conquered . A French king passed through the streets of London a prisoner ; an English monarch was crowned in Paris . No folly or infatuation of modern times can despoil us of this garland of fame bequeathed by our heroic ancestors . But internal discord and the internecine hatred of fellow-countrymen for a while obscured the halo that encircled our sea-girt isle . Through many long years the land was fattened by the blood of its best and bravest citizens . The floodgates of society were broken down . The very ties of family were severed and ignored . At length light began to glimmer through the thick darkness . Through the tides of civil faction the Coraraons surged to the surface . The power of the feudal barons was ' hopelessl y crushed , that of the Crown firmly secured , while the public liberties were left not unguarded . The marriage of Elizabeth of "York to Henry of Lancaster reconciled the two rival Houses , and established the line of Tudor on the throne . A haughty and self-willed race were those Tudors ; but the passive resistance of the Commons raised an impassable barrier against absolute despotism . Sometimes , indeed , they went still further ; they repelled the iron hand of the Eighth Henry , and caused even the steadfast Elizabeth to pause and retire . The constitutional opposition of the Commons derived an increased importance from the absence of a standing army , by means of which the sovereign might otherwise have forced his will , or whim , upon the nation as the law of the land . At the same time the royal prerogative was equally defended by the incapacity of the great lords to bring an army of retainers into the field ; while the country gentlemen , when united , were together too strong to suffer the encroachments of the Crown . Unlike the aristocracy of other countries , there was in England no positive line of demarcation between the nobles and the Commons . The most powerful lord in the land might be proud of the friendship and alliance of a simple gentleman . The only true distinction was gentle blood , not rank or wealth . The highest peer of the realm could boast of no title superior to that of an English gentleman . The noblest and purest blood often flowed in the veins of an untitled commoner . The son of a duke sat in the Lower House as a country squire or other commoner , and held himself honoured by being- admitted into theirranks . The monarch on his throne , the squire in his hall , the peasant in his hovel , were connected by one continuous chain , of which no one link could be broken or enlarged without affecting all the others . The king could not exalt himself at the expense of his nobles , nor the nobles at the expense of the Crown ; while the Commons , bent only on preserving the equipoise of the commonwealth , had no thought of encroaching on the prerogatives of the one , or on the privileges of the other . A solidity was thus imparted to the British constitution which has enabled it to pass triumphantly through the perils of the civil wars , the Protectorate and the Restoration , and to laugh to scorn the terrors of the French Revolution . A new element , a new phase , in public affairs now presents itself . Restless or disappointed ambition , perhaps a true perception of the errors and corruptions of the Romish Church , had more than once induced partial attempts at reformation ; which , fortunately , were stifled in their birth . Fortunately , because , owing to the comparative ignorance of the clergy and the positive ignorance of the laity , no good result could possibly hnveeusucd . The former could with difficulty read the Offices of the day , which they seldom understood ; the latter could neither read nor understand might that was written , whether sacred or profane . The price of manuscript * was such as to render them unattainable except by individuals of great wealth , or by conventual bodies . Knowledge of every kind , save of the ordinary practical details of life , was thus necessarily restricted to a very limited number of persons , and of these still fewer desired any change or amendment . The task of reforming the Church would therefore have fallen into most incompetent hands , and the remed y have proved far worse than the disease . It would much exceed our scanty space were wo to enter upon the investigation of the various causes which ultimately combined to introduce the Reformation into England . Jt is sufficient to remark that in this country the change was neither so violent nor so complete as in Scotland nnd on the continent . This may be partly accounted for by the circumstance that the Papal despotism had never been so predominant in this as in foreign lands , and that , consequently , it was regarded with less personal animosity . I tut it may be more justly attributed to the tastes and temperament of Henry VIII ., who ever loved a certain degree of pomp and parade , and whose separation from the Church of Rome can hardly be assigned to conscientious conviction . A large proportion of the people , however , and not . a few of the clergy , were n o doubt prone to run into the opposite extreme ; but they were sensible that nothing could be done without the protection of the king , while Henry was equally aware that he could not dispense with the support of his Protestant subjects . A compromise was therefore effected , and thence arose the Ang lican Church . But although the majority adhered to this excellent establishment , a vast number of ardent and zealous spirits aimed at a more decided severance from Romish ceremonials , and devoted themselves to the practice of asceticism and self-denial . It may bo readily imagined that these Puritan s , as they were derisively called , would become exceedingly odious to the Court ; and it can be no matter of surprise that they were subjected to a most cruel and unjust persecution , both by the sensual and imperious Henry , and In * not less imperious , if less sensual , daughter Elizabeth . But their sufferings . however severe and unmerited , failed to weaken their loyalty and affection for that masculine Queen . Their religion had undergone ouch grievous peril tinder Mary , that they freely accepted the injustice of Elizabeth towards themselves in consideration of her firm and consistent adherence to tlio Reformed faith . Under James I they were not disposed to be equally tractable . That imbecile pedant interfered with everything , and damaged ever )'" I thing with which he interfered . During his miserable reign the Kng 1 ' ?" I nation lost nil its influence on the Continent , and the Crown much of its
Untitled Article
. 1 fln T H E L , E APE R . [ No , 298 , Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 8, 1855, page 1180, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2118/page/16/
-