On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
ssSesK ^ - ^^^^ SrrrJt ^ X aSSs ^ S ^^ Wtt ^' sA--- ' - * - Kwledge which we loved . to the subject . The The review of H . i / pb's " ^ P ^^ ^ mOve than an analysis of Pea-« Life and Writings of Dr . ?™ * ^ J £ * $ W excite by far the greatest cookbook . Bi ^ i ^ ^^^^^ lumd . Directgrapphng attention is that oa « Atheism by _ - » ™ none . but the to * e is lofty and with the position of Atbe » m *««»»* £ , ^ idered as alarmingly so . For liberal , and much of tlie arn instance : - . . . ^ . .. wttsi -live without Godin the world
^ heu peopleI - ^ trto tbeu . -own Theism . JJ ^^^^ fr ^ - » - they assume what is , W ^ doea t anse as is common ^ PP ^ , arn SS ^ S 5 £ S ^ IsSSS 1 J ^ " tSU ^ Sl l ? wS ^ ° fc- ^^ e « fe «be found animated by a real conscious per _ deserves egpecial ^ A ^ ain , the wisdom of this sentence , *» ld " ^" J ^ effects than that Pr attention : "Nereis no . ttadntg ^ - ^ powem ^ £ which makes human belief m GodJ ^ ^ ^ ^^ conse * society , and Goo Himself ^^^ efore lirnits that blessing to the ' h 2 uence of man ^ s confess ^ , ani " ^ iu , is very noteworthy :- M larrow bonnds of the confess , . ' relaiively to re duce the i n fluence P . s&esmMggsis&ssz ' . cia . 1 impukea . and ttioBe e ... ,, _ . ' ba u adapting or Uh 5 \\ 511 S he soon 1 the pr 1 » f 5- SS r ¦ *• fffi L ^ ,
' — both involuntarily -d ^ unconsSioudy ^ ^ S ^ SS ^ Z ^^^ ^^ haunting image of the divine ch » r ™^^ r becauSe the atheist must m consis- tl ^^^ rr ^^^^^ s ^^ i i &ka ^ rsn i ^^ -3 [ of existence , the atheist cannot regard g * ° ^ £ gt inuinination of their own , — i i affection , and so forth—as having any l ™ epenaer * infinite dawn from above — L skyligbts opened to let i « « pon ^ ^^ t ng ^ reflecting the whole edific but rather as a polished arch or dome ^ co ^^ fche ab 3 Olutely highest beneath . To Him the highest point ° ^ S ciSe roofs us in beyond ; and of i 1 point in the mental universe ; mere n ^^ JT ^ de rive their sole vabdity 1 bourse , therefore , the highest ****» ££ £ S ? to which they add tlve . fimshmg I and their sole meaning from the \« ™ wer anA insight is gained , the I touch . So doubt he will fny * ** £ J ^ J ^ ver is not power from beyond I higher self-culture is pushed ; but the new poj , ^ above it ; it is only 1 human nature , the new insight is not insigUt ««« ^ f a 1 T 10 V e compre-1 ? he stronger grasp of a more practised J ^ tMa cSd ! Ath « amnecessarily propa 1 heusive survey . Hence , by d ^" " ^?^^ on the lower organisation , I up the higher faculties of man f 3 >^ ^ eove rf the atheist is l « d to jus ify I aid denies them any independent spung .. More ove , by m& 1 and fortify himself in this natural ™?^ <* ^ orBW if there be any , ought to b « & as Feuerbach does that the object of nian s wwug , . ft m lfied 8 badow |; a perfect man , and that the theistB Jod > b not ev J . of lvumanity . I % o / humanity , but only of a apeaal - ^^^ J ^ be reg arded ^ P . ukbbaoh ' 8 answer to this would be , I ^^ J g r we ht , d ? as the highest ideal . " There are s « v ^ ^^ f ^^^ w forbid further I marked for extract and discussion ; but o » i ^^ T ^^ tlie maaterly I extension . We must couvey in » «»^^ ^ and so dismiss the •| ¦ criticism of Thackbb * y as moralist ar » a artist - ana I National for the present . : 1 ! I I 0 , f y g e 7 ? a ? ' | , v * :. «
Untitled Article
INTRODUCTION TO GENESIS . # I W- * r U the office of the IHbUc . critic ta relation to the Old Tcsta . ent T There are various answers to this guestion . . f blo cxtemal evidence I Extreme orthodoxy say a , that sine e t ie « »« ret ™ Z ™ fl ^^ Scriptures for the Divine origin and ^ reet v « Ul inapuafaon ^ nn recortl wUi h the critic has simply to interpret ««« J " ^ J « ~ J hypothesis , ia to . be ia in contradiction with the text , if not recjnc" ^ y ^ . contra , uctlon pronounced false ; but if an «»< lOT » J ? J" 5 f * ^ vcc ^ sidercd and altcrerl so with the text , the received m ^ rprctatum w to be >«^; h tlie critic has m to agree with the untamable fact . AccohIwi ^»*> ™ J ^ JJ ^ ovigin , but not to examine the Hebrew writings m order to uncertain
iffta not to Weigh e « de »« jB-gj ^^^ a by MMb ta . a ^ Hg ' sti ^ swa ^^ -iaa- , ar ^ £ eonSqaently anthropomorp hic j ^ P ^ ' ^^ f . ^ HehwehaveiJodifficnlty s ^^ SSSJ ^^^ rtr-s ^ rS the information . he gives to tn « eut n fj ui d tbe narTatives o £ tbe way that the candid Dr . Pye . ™** **? ° Evangelical brethren . It Creation and the Deluge , to % 8 P ^ SSo ^ W * uStic . *** tbat it may easy to see that this system of interpretation ^ very history of human lmount to little more ** £ ^ ^^ % ^ cZmodatdn and that sHBSSsa fe ^ sisas ^ Kass ^^ sass ^ ^ ence of mythical and ^ P * ^^ to end infallible , bat stQl bounces the idea that they are from . S S ^^^ tke shell that held a -Wtf& 5 ? £ SSSan ^^^^^ ^ s ^ gSsi - ^ x ^ sr ^ is ^ K" ^^ - ^ jo ^ s K oroohet something more t ^ * ^ rwthes They do not feeVabout ^ rsomething more than t ^ H ^^ the He ^^^^^^ LtLof I ^ el is a sacred prec mct _____ ^ sg
* i . ! S isis or *> »« . - •»— . » - ' -i -T I to them-tbey tin their shoes from off ^^ J »^ ffiffS ^ only them ?? herefore , tlie Old Testament ^ is rtil an ^ ceptio ^^^ ^ . ^ Sets ? Sft ^^^ ST ? - ^^ <> Christ ^ a SP - -rSe ^ o ? ^ ^ aS ^ eoX ^ Hebrew scriptures from the commonJ " ^ WClarifying at their later stages are a combination of myth and legend ^^ ff ^ [ natioB y of tbe Old Testament into gennine history . It enters on * * ^ on as imreServed a submission with as perfect a ^^/^ Xism as if it Were examining the Yedas » or to the guidance of ^^ f ^^ S vh ^ Sho and Sanchoniathon . On thus the Zendavesta , or the ^ S ^ " ^ ^^ "" light of common day , " w ^ thlooking at the Hebrew records by ^ the « k evidence of anything out th ! lamp of faitli , *«^ _ J ^ JSy * SThSLy « nd -literature of a exceptionally divine , but sees m them s » mp » 7 " ferocious polytheism , barbarous tribe that gradually rosejxom ^^ ^ i < lailce of their best offering human sacrifices , and . uf * im 5 Sions £ Jehov ^ stic monotheism . It men and contact with more civihse V * Tvrtiieal cosmogony , an impossible finds T « them , as in other early ^^^^^ vSsJSd vanity or to chronology , and extravagant ^ iJSSSSt ^ o ^ ption . of Deit y in docuaggrandise a pnesthood ; J . . ^^^ Fce it finds legislative enactments , ments attributed to one ft ™ , \ pr ^ s ^" pea lnt \ x the sanction of P » Pl ™ J springing from an advanced P « mkU WfJ ? ^^ . short , it not only finds sfe _ 53 £ a « i 3 i £ S « = iiKe ! S CattriE to ' any other than a . > ™ " ^ rS t " " by vcry grave and compesfjrearAss ^ SAhrl sssts ; LJ . uoh knowledge in a concise form than ^ liohlen ' s vvas a tbpat Ao head
Hron Boblen , name ^ l « ^ " jj ^ ^ nced n evcr be S SSf ^ S ^ LvhMh ombrwo tbe f urw of IJcb . ^ ^ ^^^ discussed cle T « IaStr ^ Sl y , -STtL reader , thUgh h . may not accept
Untitled Article
ssss ^ &SsiSns' ?^? make it accord with ttegprennsa . He b nOTro m losioBj but haraig ndar 41 j ^^ ^ — - . IIll ^ Ji ^^ M ^ sttf'fetsaga ^^
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Jan. 12, 1856, page 41, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2123/page/17/
-