On this page

• Text (3)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    Bras less so than Li « ny . Them , however , we pass by , to dwell for a moment on the extraordinary conduct of Napoleon after the battle he had won . Apathetic as he Had been on the morningof the 16 th , he committed a worse fault on the 17 th . Then he gave Biucher time to concentrate three-fourths of his whole force on the position of battle ; now he lost sight of his enemy altogether . It is the most amazing , the most incredible fact in the whole history of his Belgian campaign , that , although the rear-guard of the Prussians remained on the field until the dawn of the 17 th , Napoleon allowed them to slip away he knew not whither . He took it for granted that the Prussians had retreated upon Namur and Liege . He knew nothing whatever as to their movements . This is inexplicable . One fails to under " stand how a chief so famous for the destructive pursuit of a beaten army could have become so negligent . Nevertheless , it is the fact that it was not until late on the night of the 17 th that G-rouchy , sent in pursuit , with instructions not to lose sight of an enemy who liad already disappeared , discovered that Blucher had retreated to Wavre . Napoleon , who had slept at Fleurus , reviewed his troops on the field of battle . It was not until the middle of the day that he directed Grouchy to follow the Prussians , and took himself the road to Quatre Bras . From this moment it may be said the fate of the campaign was decided . The golden opportunity of victory over both his foes had fallen from his feeble grasp . Yet how dangerous he was , even under these disadvantages , the advance on Charleroi , the victory at Ligny , the rapid march on the field of Waterloo , has shown . Wellington , thoroughly roused by the events of the 16 th , was in the field at daylight on the 17 th . Fully aware that , if Blucher had been defeated , his position had become untenable , he caused a reconnoissance to be made on the JSTamur road . By these means , and by the arrival of an officer from the Prussian army , he learnt their defeat , and intended concentration at Wavre , and he informed the Prussian general that he should fall back upon the position of Waterloo , and accept battle there , provided he could count upon the support of two Prussian corps . Wellington forthwith began that ably conducted retrograde movement which , it appears to us , has not been appreciated by Colonel Charras . Napoleon followed . Again he was too late . As he had lost sight of the Prussians , so he had not been able to overtake the Anglo-Dutch army ; and Wellington , thanks to the ability with which Vivian and Uxbridge covered his rear ; ' Arrived almost unmolested in his chosen position . The result of the da'ps ^ Ciperations was , that while the Prussians and English had regained their communications , the French were split into two fragments , separated by many miles and a difficult country , one being in front of Wellington , the other still ignorant of the whereabouts of Blucher , and quite beyond the reach of Napoleon . Time was pressing . Napoleon ' s only chance , considering the enormous odds arrayed against him , was to deal swift and decisive blows right and left : not to pause one moment in his career ; not to sleep upon his success ; not to hesitate an instant ; but to carry out , with resistless speed , lis great design . Time fought against him ^ and he did not disarm this powerfu l enemy by unfailing promptitude and foresight . Colonel Charras proves , to demonstration , the almost incredible defects of his proceedings on the J 7 th J " , defects which Captain Siborne and other writers l » ad indicated with sufficient precision , but not with such abundant proof . ¦ . Having followed our author to the field of the decisive battle , we must here leave him awhile , and resume our remarks at a convenient season .

    Untitled Article

    ESSAYS ON THE FRENCH REVOLUTION " . Essays on the Early Period of the French Revolution . By the late John Wilson Croker . Reprinted from the Quarterly Iteview , with Additions and Corrections . Murray . These essays cannot be properly described as historical or critical . They are invectives on historical subjects in a critical form . The malignant violence of Mr . Croker ' s style was effective at a time when * the late Mr . Burke' was an authority on the events of the French Revolution , and it may have been serviceable when a false or vicious writer was to be nailed to a pillory ; but Mr . Croker did not use his knife in the interests of literature ; he was a political partisan , s 6 furious in his antipathies , so inveterate in his egotism , and so reckless in his statements , that whenever he set himself to vituperate or scandalize an author , he was certain to fall into several errors at least as unpardonable as those which he thought he was stamping out of existence . The motto of this volume might have been taken from Christopher North : " Let them , come on ; one by one they die wriggling on the point of my peri . " Wilson always fancied himself to be writing with a dagger in one hand and a thistle in the other ; but Wilson Croker , according- tonis own belief , was a whirlpool drawing into his vortex volumes of all sizes , and hurling them out wrecked , empty , and in ruins . The first article in the collection begins : " We believe we shall be able to demolish utterly and irretrievably M . Thiers ' s credit as an historian . " No doubt Mr . Croker did tear up several chapters of Thiers ' s history , exactly as ho left Sir Archibald Alison in rags ; but he was the last man to complain with justice of factious sympathies , seeing that he himself allowed nothing but his personal animosities to stand in the way of his political prejudices . In the first E laco , he never was capable of understanding the French Revolution ; e was a mere anti-Jacobin , a man sworn to vilify the destroyers of the Bourbon throne , and he was more partial and threw more rancour into his partiality than Any one of the authors whom he so bitterly assailed . If Thicrs be a fraudulent writer , mean in motive , a liar by habit , and an impostor by nature—if , indeed , Mr . Croker had a right to say so mucli of »\ ny contemporary—the essay which prefers the charge should at all events be free from gross discolorations of facts , and effusions of the narrowest political sectarianism . r Xhe writer professed to have scrutinized in close detail the literature of the French , Revolution , and assumed to set right all his French contemporaries ; but he was either ignorant of a large muss of the aiost valuable evidence , or he wilfully suppressed a number of important elucidations , bearing strongly on the points at issue . Mr . Croker , however , was so unmercifully vituperutive , whenever , in a book oil his favourite subject , he found a piece of gossip mistaken for an authentic testimony , that we should have a right to be surprised when we find him continually wandering into the most vulgar fallacies , were it not that he never had impressed us with an idea of his critical penetration . The task he assumed was that of stabbing , not correcting . When , however , he came to deal with Marie Antoinette , howdid he picture her ? As a stainless queen , as a woman against whom the French people never had cause of olfeucc . We do not refer to the imputations of licentiousness—these have been in great part exploded , and whatever the residue , it ia too late to disturb her dust on the score of her

    Untitled Article

    HISTORY AT A GLANCE . Tlie " Eighteen Christian Centuries . By the Rev . James White , Author of ? Landmarks of the History of England . ' Blackwood and Sons . Mb . White is a master of popular historical composition . It is charming to read history when he writes it . The study of some books is a duty ; here it is a pleasure . We would not have all histories written in a similar manner ; we must have Livy and Tacitus , Gibbon and Hume , Prescott and Macaulay ; « nd the more of them appear , the richer will be the libraries of Europe , No one who has a style could be spared ; if we prize Louis Blanc , it is not that we would obliterate Michelet ; admiring Burke , it is not necessary to disparage Fox—his oratorical contrast ; nor would it be philosophical , because pomp and splendour of idea and diction are fascinating when appropriate , to undervalue the clear , sparkling simplicity of Mr . White . This merit in his book is peculiar , and claims particular notice . Here we have a volume in which the results of extensive and various studies have been brought together , but in which the materials , gathered far and wide , have been so perfectly assimilated , that the narrative flows as rapidly and smoothly as a Christmas talc , and might be supposed to be told by an English patriarch to a flock of quiet listeners . At the same time , Mr . White , familiar as he is , understands the art of colouring his outlines , which place the history of the world , since the beginning of the Christian era , in one view , as distinctly as upon a map . This , we think , is not common praise ; but it is duo to & work marked by so unusual a combination of modesty with merit . Mr . White had evidently furnished his memory from a largo range of authorities before he commenced this volume , which is not compiled , but written—and that is a virtue rare in epitomes . It is easy to distinguish between fabricated episodes , cumbrously joined together , and the full , harmonious flow of sjn author who has possessed himself of his subject in its entirety , instead of investigating as he goes . Half tlie books published , especially on history , are produced by persons who first see their way by means of the lump they are lighting for the public . This is not the case with Mr . White . He leads tho way , because liu knows it . Ho writes with care , because lie has read with diligence . His plan ia to construct eighteen historical links , connecting tlio first century with tho nineteenth , not goingback so far as to invade tho territory of pure paganism , or approaching so near our own times as to entangle himself in judgments on living men . 'J . 'he narrative , we have said , is plain and clenr ; but it ia not destitute of ornament j Mr . White is very happy and ready in tlio art of literary illustration , so tluit a sort of logical imagination plays over the pages , bringing the early centuries into the abundant light of our own times . . Nor is humour absent .

    All real historians diverge at times into irony ; they know that nothing is so repulsive as the solemn dissection of a fool . But that for which , this book is chiefly to be valued is the rapidity with which its readers may recognise any one of the eighteen Christian centuries by its characteristics . Mr . White is no pedant , and does not construct picturesque parallels or dive into profound analogies , yet he paints the portraits of generations , and you recognize them by their features . This is a very careful and effective method of dealing with history ; it accounts foT the difference between the works of art and artisanship . Indeed , when a manual is distinguished by such qualities , it becomes a book of reference for all classes of readers , instead of being merely a serviceable summary for the indolent or the youn <» . We will make one quotation—it describes Froissart : — ° John Froissart , called by the courtesy of the time Sir John , in honour of his being priest and chaplain , devoted a loDg life to the collection of the fullest and most trustworthy accounts of all the events and personages characteristic of his time . From 1326 , when his labours commence , to 1400 , when his active pen stood still , nothing happened in any part of Europe that the Paul Pry of the period did not rush off to verify on the spot . If he heard of an assemblage of knights going on at the extremities of France , or in the centre of Germany ; of a tournament at Bordeaux , a court gala in Scotland , or a marriage festival at Milan , hi 3 travels began—whether in the humble guise of a solitary horseman , with his portmanteau behind his saddle , and a single greyhound at his heels , as he jogged wearily across the Border , till he finally arrived ia Edinburgh ; or in his grandeur style of equipment , gallant steed , with hackney led beside him , and four dogs of high race gambolling round his horse , as he made his dignified journey from Ferrara to Rome . Wherever life was to be seen and painted , the indefatigable Froissart waa to be found . Whatever he lad gathered up on former expeditions , whatever he learned in his present tour , down it went in his own exquisite language , with his own ( poetical impression of the pomps and pageantries he beheld ; and wien at the end of his journey he reached the court of prince or potentate , no higher treat could be offered to the * noble lords and ladies bright' than to form a glittering circle round the enchanting chronicler , aud listen to what he had written . From palace to palace , from castle to castle , the unwearied * picker-up of unconsidered trifles' ( which , however , ivere neither trifles nor unconsidered , -when their true value became known , as giving life and reality to the annals of a whole period ) , pursued his happy way , certain of a friendly reception when he arrived , and certain of not losing his time by negligence or blindness on the road . If he overtakes a stately cavalier , attended by squires and men-at-arms , he enters into conversation , drawing out the experiences of the venerable warrior by relating to him all he inew of things and persons in which lie took an interest . And when they put up at some hostelry on the xoad , and while the gallant knight was sound asleep on his strawstuffed couch , and his followers were wallowing amid the rushes on the parlour floor , Froissart was busy with pen and , note-book , scoring down all the old gentleman had told him , all the fights he had been present at , and the secret history ( if any ) of the councils of priests and . kings . In this way knight a ia distant parts of the world became known to each other . Without acquiescing in all Mr . "White ' s opinions , we can cordially praise this book , as delightful to read , and most creditable to its author .

    Untitled Article

    No . 404 , December 19 , 1857 . ] THE LEAi ) IIK . 1217

• Citation
  • Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 19, 1857, page 1217, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2222/page/17/