On this page
-
Text (4)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
conscious usefulness m the Negro would "be the immediate result ; and he would be on the sure road to that freedom , which would be necessary to the full development of bis knowledge and usefulness , even for his employer . But that i s a rescue from slavery and the slave trade which the African , squadron only delays , nay , absolutely prevents , so long as the force is maintained . Negro emancipation and peace alike command that we should cease the futile and arrogant mission of endeavouring , sword in hand , to teach the American Republic its duty .
Untitled Article
THE REFORM DEBATES . Action and success are the best organizers . The Liberal party have been in possession of the House of Commons this week . They have forced the Abolition of Church Rates through a third reading , and the County Franchise Bill through a second ; and they have made a powerful stand for the Ballot . The old arguments were employed against Mr . Berkeley ' s motion , and there was of course a majority in favour of open voting j but , counting pairs , we find two hundred and twenty-one members of Parliament declaring- against the electoral system as now established . Prom this Reformers may take heart and hope . Platitude is inthe field , in opposition to their logic ; and prophets of yesterday declare that these yearly discussions are but sacrifices of time j ¦ but neither the Ballot Society nor the Radicals in the House of Commons will be persuaded by the drowsy sophisms of the Conservative "Whigs . We know our position well enough ; and we can afford to tell the Whig Conservatives that , if they find it impossible to yield a point at the instance of the natjun , the nation will yield more than one point in order to keep Lord John Russell and Lord Palmerston shivering upon the Opposition Benches . Both these statesmen stand forward with
a victorious demeanour when the Tories are voting with them , and reiterate their ancient complaint that Mr . Berkeley had nothing new to say , following it up with something so old , cold , and miserable , that it might perhaps be as well , in future , to vote urgency , and go into the lobbies without a debate . In fact , however , though the argument hostile to the Ballot was long ago exhausted and is now perishing for lack of sustenance , the argument on the other side gains ground every day that the Australian constitution lasts . The Ballot would not work ; the Ballot would , only work too well ; the English people are incapable of bribery
bribery would be wholesale under the Ballot . Mr . Grote heard all that when he attacked the surreptitious landlord influence , and when he exposed the corruption hovering from above over the dependent classes of voters . The time has come for abandoning the ordinary tactics , and for the Liberal party to tell the Whigs plainly that they -will not act as their militia on the Bedford level . Lord John Russell will not have the Ballot . _ Well , then , the Ballot , as represented in . the Legislature , will not have Lord John Russell . If he . be content to smile at the solecism , his satisfaction can be no annoyance to the Parliamentary
reformers . It is for them to count their forces , to unite , and to carry on the war , and they will discover their Scipio when they are in need of his services . The history of their party may well encourage them to confidence and independence . Who were the Radical Reformers of 1830 P Not seventy men in Parliament . They made up the Whig majority . After 1832 , they numbered a hundred and fifty , and the political organs of that day exhibited the Whigs petitioning the Radicals for qlms , and praying not only for support , but for ideas and even measures . Why , then , are the Radicals © f the present Parliament in
hesitation as to the cause they shall pursue ? They have driven both Whigs and Tories into the pitfal of the Charter , and the House of Commons has finall y decided against the property qualification . Sir John Trelawny ' s charge to the same jury has resulted in the final condemnation of Church Rates by the Commons . The Conservatives bend hel p lessly to the Reform of the County representation , and the admission of Jews into Parliament is forced upon noble peers , lessby the sincerity of Lord John Russell and Sir Richard Bcthell , than by the severity of the hundred and twenty gcntlcwen who met in Committee Room No . 11 . ... ™ , *? n 0 conceivable reason why the Ballot , like Church Rates , should not become a Reform for
fide . Its members , so far from being incendiaries , are , with two or three exceptions , hot even popular orators . If they have not the nonchalance of the aristocracy , neither have tliey the passion ascribed to the multitude ; and if they have among them no leader , no statesman who might merge their differences in his own single-mindedness and intellectual supremacy , they stand before the country more than two hundred strong , with more than one ^ pbsitive success obtained during the present session , and with the best possible opportunity , if they manage their influence wisely , of driving the Whigs at least into a compromise . Indeed / with
the Whigs to pan in pressing upon Parliament . It is an old question and once seemed hopeless to those who were dismayed by majorities . But times change ; leaders fall away , and the course of nature operates upon the constitution of Parliament The parties that diminish are those of the Whigs and Tories ; that of the Radical Reformers is steadily and perpetually upon the increase . Men of eminence adhere to it , —men of enlightenment and intellectual ability . It is no longer possible to decry them as demagogues . There is not , at present , a demagogue in Parliament . The advancing Liberal party is that in which the most sober-minded classes of the community
conreference to Church Rates , Sir John Trelawny carried his point by rejecting all compromises whatever . He insisted on the . Bill , the whole Bill , and nothing but the Bill , and a majority of sixtythree sent up his message to the Lords , although accompanied by Mr . Gladstone ' s appeal to the peerage on behalf of the Established Church and all her sources of income . The work done by the Liberals this session places the matter beyond dispute , that , if they could establish unity among themselves arid take up a Parliamentary position in regular order of battle , they might speedily form a party no less compact than
that of the Conservatives , and , in point of numbers , quite as formidable . This would leave the Whigs in a permanent minority ; and whatever is lost to them is gained by the advanced Reformers . The three discussions of the present week on Church Rates , on the Ballot , and on the County Franchise , have distinctly separated and sealed the various classes of the Liberals , and have cut off Lord Palmerston and Lord John Russell from the hope of any enthusiastic support below the gangway . Notwithstanding their votes on the County Franchise , their Ballot speeches convict them of insincerity , for all men must be insincere
who declare themselves opposed to Toryism while they advocate the practice of open voting . At any rate , while Mr . Bright ' s most masterly and luminous speech remains unanswered , no politician pretending to be a Reformer can affirm , upon his honour , his belief that the eyils attacked by Mr . Berkeley would be aggravated if Mr . Berkeley ' s motion were carried . The House of Commons is beginnii % to feel the pressure of the great necessity acknowledged out of doors . It is closing up the ranks . The day of -Reform is approaching , and whoever would lead the Liberal party must cordially embrace its prinoiples .
Untitled Article
HOW TO MAKE CHURCH RATES POPULAR . Sm John Trei , a . wny has carried his Abolition of Church Rates Bill through the House of Commons with a good majority , and it goes , in due course , up to the Lords—to be negatived . The inevitable does not shock Sir John , therefore he is cool and collected , and only careful to try and make the best of it : let those -vvho wish for a compromise , he said , leave the Lords to " exercise their powers of invention , " and " when the bill comes back , the onus will be cast upon its supporters of refusing that which mi g ht be a practical suggestion . " Mr . Gladstone and Sir James Graham were the representative men of tllfc opposite sides of the bootless discussion which brought the ceremony of the third reading of the bill to a close . Mr . Gladstone resisted the measure because it " contained an authoritative declaration of the principle that the majorit y had no right to obtain any support for any particular form of religion . " Sir James Graham stated emphatically that lie was' * born and educated within the pale of the Church of England , " which had no more " attached friend" than himself ; but speaking in the interest of the Church , he was ready to make a timely concession on this point . Now , both these speakers arc advanced men of the ago , both Conservatives ; both arc moved by the desire to do , but withheld by the fear of consequences ,
imaginary or real . Reason and the ripe necessity of the time spur them on , the black shadows that environ change frighten , them back . They will and they will not ; and their state of mind represents the state of Parliamentary opinion , which sends the Church Rates Abolition Bill up to the House of Lords , to be rejected . Sir James ' s suggestion for the support of the parish church is to relax the Statute of Mortmain , so as to enable landowners to charge their estates to a certain extent for its maintenance , the Bishops and Archdeacons supplying whatever additional
moneys may be required out of their ample funds ; and his arguments would all thoroughly apply if the Church were only a sect , as Mr . Gladstone ' s would if the Church were open to all English Christians : Mr . Gladstone cannot see why » if people object to pay church rates , they should object to be called Dissenters . But the objection is , that the Church is not open to all its own proper members ; the rich pew-holder stops the way of the less well-off church-goer . Quash the sore question of pews , and there will be little objection to pay church rates : but there will be a never-ceasing opposition on the part of those who are called upon ,
to pay for what they are not permitted to enjoy . In many parishes the church is built by the landowner ; in those cases , either the public has rights or it has not . If the church belongs to the landowner , what right has he to ask for rates P If the church \ s bond fide the parish church , what has the landowner to do with it at all ? Why should he even present the incambent ? But all doubts an ! all disputes as to church-maintenance would pass away , and it would find abundant provision for all its needs , ' were its doors thrown , fairl y and in a . large Christian spirit , open to the people . Let all its services be like its " special" services , let its teaching and its conduct be thorough , and we shalL have no more heart-burning and indecent squabbles over paltry questions of a penny in the poundthe Commons proposing , the Lords disposing .
Untitled Article
STATE OF THE INDIAN QUESTION . The debate at home resembles in its fluctuations the rebellion in India . It is constantly announced that all is prepared for an immediate solution of the difficulty ; but time goes on , and Ministerial victories are gained without any decisive result . When Delhi was taken the insurrection was proclaimed to have lost its head . When Lord Palmerston was followed by his first majority , the passage of an India Bill this year was announced as a certainty . Lucknow was reduced , but the hot season overtook our armies in the midst of a campaign . Lord Harry Vane was beaten , yet Mr . Gladstone had the courage to take the field with a parallel motion . Mr . Gladstone is defeated , and the House of Commons votes that nothing shall delay the reorganization of the home government of India . It voted that declaration four months ago , and it has not advanced one step towards definite legislation , Tke question still is , not whether the Indian machinery should be changed , but how ? Aboat ei g ht weeks of the ordinary session remain , and within that-interval , not only has a bill to be read three times , and passed through Committee in either House , it has yet to be introduced after fourteen resolutions have been debated , with the long list of amendments upon them which fifteen gentlemen still stand forward to propose . If the House of Commons could achieve this great work within two months , it would earn a reputation for business habits . But the Lords will consider nothing sent up to them in July ; and when we keep these circumstances in view , it is scarcely rash to assume that the session will bear no fruit in the form of an Indian measure , or that the scheme of Parliament will be a mere crudity and a deception . The whole question remains in an unsettled state , inside and outside of the Legislature . Nothing has been determined with respect to the composition of the Council : —its numbers , the election or nomination of its members , or the grades of qualification required . The military problem is a great anarchy of conflicting propositions . The powers and responsibilities of the Governor-General have not even been preliminarily discussed . The Indian debt and patronage are made ihc subjects of perpetual suggestions from quarters in whVSh opposition will rise against the plans of the Ministry . We arc upon the threshold of the debate , and if we are to arrive at a conolusion this year , it must be by an operation more rap id than we arc accustomed to witness when a political manufacture is carried on in the British Parliament . The question hns been held in suspense from tue
Untitled Article
No , 429 , June 12 , 1858 . ] T H JE L E A D E B . 5 fiK
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 12, 1858, page 565, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2246/page/13/
-