On this page
-
Text (6)
-
148 THE LIAJER. [No. 462, Jan^abt 29,185...
-
CORRESPONDENCE.
-
(To the Editor of The Leader,") Sir,—All...
-
A BJ3AL ROMANCE. Foktt ye»rs ago there l...
-
ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE... ¦' • ' • ' ' ...
-
FRANCE. (Front our own Correspondent.' )...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Vital Statistics Of The Society Of ¦Rr Tpnns *Ivi^^O
sudden change in the " movements" of a population . Now I submit that the data I . have used in estimating the mortality of the Society of Friend * fulfil these conditions i the period of ten years ia not too long ; the population amounting to between * eighteenand nineteen ' thbusand is sufficiently large ; and , moreover , though secessions from marriage and othfer causes have been very abundant , there have been no new circumstances between 1842 and 1852 to create a sudd * n change in the " rate of decrease , or relative distribution of the different Ages . ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ' '¦ ¦• ¦ ' . ' ¦ ¦''¦¦' It is very true that if any numerical data you may require were to be had for the asking we should be able to do without these assumptions altogether . But it is not so . Statisticians have to make the best of the data before them , and it is part of their science to determine what assumptions are justifiable , and what , on the other hand , would Bo modify the results as to exceed certain limits of eiror—those limits which pertain to the very observations themselves . The numerical data relative to the Society of Friends arevery incomplete . The secessions from the society for various causes have been numerous . Those from marriage alone you have very much understated in your article . Other cause * of separation operate to a considerable extent ; but I know Of no data sufiiciently trustworthy to correct the relative numbers of the population , as you say I should have done . Had I possessed any such I would gladly have employed them . . . ^ Tour remark that my paper conveyed no information to the hearers is a very trenchant one . If it mean that I did not enter into the social and moral causes of these phenomena and attempt to explain them , your remark is true . The omission was intentional . My business was to present facts , not precisely in the crude form of obaervation , but facts methodised and reduced to their general expressions . Speculation on the causes of these facts is quite a different matter , and , spite of the hardihood you impute to me , I know enough of the complexity of the subject to make me cautious in my conclusions , and prefer , in addressing a scientific society , that others should draw their inferences from the material that I had to offer . If , on the other hand , you mean that I brought forward no general facts from the experience of the Society of Friends , bearing on the science of population , that were of sufficient interest and value to be read to the Statistical Society , I can only say that I hope , when you have had an . opportunity of reading the paper , you will alter your opinion . Begging you will excuse the length of these remarksj I am yours respectfully , J . J . Fox . Stoke Mewington , Jan , 15 th , 1 ? 59 :
148 The Liajer. [No. 462, Jan^Abt 29,185...
148 THE LIAJER . [ No . 462 , Jan ^ abt 29 , 1859 . ** ' .,. •'¦ ¦¦ - ¦ - ¦¦ ' ¦ i ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ . » . : ; ; , ; , —__^_ , _________ ^—_^ j-j- , —_ .
Correspondence.
CORRESPONDENCE .
(To The Editor Of The Leader,") Sir,—All...
( To the Editor of The Leader , ") Sir , —Allow me to correct nn error which , on the perusal of the letter from your Paris correspondent on *• the Count de Godineau and cuneiform writing" ( published in your paper . of the 22 nd instant ) , I find has been inade by your reporter . In this letter the name of my brother , Dr . Julius Oppert , has been mentioned as that of a countryman of III , do Godineau , and particular attention is drawn to the fact of his having , as such , corroborated the translation of some passages by English linguists . Permit me to state that pT . Qppert is not a Frenchman , but a German by birth , although he holds an appointment uuder the JFrench Government at Paris . I am , Sir , your obedient servant , E . Oppert . Jan . 25 , 1852 .
A Bj3al Romance. Foktt Ye»Rs Ago There L...
A BJ 3 AL ROMANCE . Foktt ye » rs ago there lived in London a lady whose station was equivocal , and whose name waa more equivocal still . Her mother was styled Mrs , Taylor , whereas the lady ' s own designation was supposed really to be Wall , but was practically Jones . She waa living in the year 1819 with a nobleman as hia mistress , a"hd her personal beauty was so remarkable that witnesses who could not identify her by any other distinction spoke unhesitatingly to that . Mrs . Jones ' s nobleman , then , contemplated matrimony , and proceeded accordingly to " disembarrass himself pf a connexion" by the approved and ' ' very honourable" method of settlement and allowance . As a result of these arrangements , Mrs . Jones found herself with the lease of a house in Morningtonplaco , where she appears jto have received lodgers of an ordinary stamp , and also to have admitted occasional yisits of a more intimate charaoter . Before many years had elapsed , however , fll ^ o took an important step in Hfe . On the 8 th of March , 1824 , she was married at Marylebone Church to Mr . John Sheppard ; as this » W « wife she lived up to 1848 5 still as his wife , but separated by « formal deed , she lived from , 1843 to 1846 , ¦ when Sheppard died , and from that time to the year before last she lived as his widow . By no persons or In any manner during these five-and-thirty years does the
reality of her position appear to have been called in question . In the year 1857 , Mrs . Sheppard died also , and so disposed of the considerable property which she had acquired through Mr . Sheppard that her friends got all , and his friends got none . This inequality of distribution created , apparently for the first time , ill blood between the families , and . the animosity found vent through an accident so strange and inconceivable as scarcely to consist with the realities of actual and unromantic life . Mrs . Sheppard ' s executors , though they parted with little else , did send some articles of apparel and so forth to Mr . Sheppard ' s friends , and among these old things there turned up one day a certificate of Mrs . Sheppard ' s marriage . " Easily accounted for , " the reader will say . , True ; but ¦ when this certificate came to-be looked at more closely , it was found , indeed , to attest the marriage of Mrs . Sheppard , but hot to Mr . S heppard , her late reputed husband . The certificate proved that eleven days before that marriage there had been another , and that the Mary Jones who on the 8 th of March waa united at Marylebone Church to John Sheppard had on the 26 th of the preceding February been united at St . Pancras Church to one James Masters ; . The second marriage was therefore * by this argument , invalid ; Mary Jones having never been John Sheppard ' s lawful wife was never his lawful widow ; and , not having been his lawful widow , had no title to the share of the estate which , as he died intestate , she had been permitted to obtain . The supporters of this argument formed the plaintiffs in the case before the Court ; the defendants were the executors of Mrs . Sheppard , who had to maintain , and did maintain , the validity of her marriage and widowhood , all this evidence to the contrary notwithstanirig . And the manner in which they succeeded was this : ^— They allowed the fact of the double marriage and the authenticity of the discovered certificate , but they averred that the two ceremonies made only one match , and the two names meant only one man , for that James Masters was identically the same individual with John Sheppard , and no other . Here was an issue to be tried nearly forty years after date ! However , by dint of search and pains- —for the property at stake was some 3000 ? . —more witnesses were brought up and more personages produced from the scenes of 1824 -than would have been thought possible : That there was at that period a real person with an existence and individuality of Ms own , who went by the name of Masters * and who was an intimate acquaintance of Mrs : Jones , : was clearly established ; but , as he had never been seen or heard of since the month of March , 1824 , the question was what to make of him ? Plaintiffs said that he was a man of much such a stamp as John Sheppard hjmself-r-viz . a working artisan j that he had married Mrs . Jones exactly as Mr . Sheppard did afterwards , and that his marriage , being first on the list , extinguished the second . The defendants gave a very different version of the story . They said that Masters was a gentleman , successor in the lady ' s favours to the nobleman above mentioned ; thathe , wishing to get her settled independently , promoted the marriage with Sheppard ; that this marriage was first solemnised by Sheppard under the assumed name of Masters , in order to confirm the lady in the designation which she had most recently borne , and that then , doubts having been thrown on , the validity of the act , a second ceremony was performed between the same parties eleven days later , to make everything secure . The "Lord Chancellor and the Lords Justices , after carefully poising the scales in which these competing probabilities and improbabilities had been heaped through a four days' trial , pronounced the balance in favour of the defendants , a decision in which most people wovld be disposed to concur . If the case appears hard to accept in this form , there is certainly a still greater violence of presumption required in accepting it in the other shape suggested . If Masters was an original and bond . fids husband , what became of him ? It was put in evidence that he did come to the house once after the date of the second marriage ; and what , therefore , could have induced him to leave his wife in the possession of another ? Moreover , as it appeared probable , from collateral evidence , that Masters was a gentleman , and not a mechanic , thoro wns something to bo learnt from a scrutiny of his signature in the parish registers . This scrutiny was made , and not only was the handwriting that of an uneducated man , but it was pronounced by professional judges to be very similar to that of Sheppard himself , —in fact , to be just such a performance as a mechanic would make in signing for the nonce some other' name instead of hie own . By these and other preponderances of argument the court was induced , upon the whole , to declare that Mrs . Sheppard l ^ ad boon lawful wife , lawful widow , and lawful testatrix 5 but perhaps the reflections of serious readers will add a passing moral . to the decision . The case conveys an impressive example of the retribution which dogs misdoing even thrpugh a second or third generation , Forty years after date the Illicit amours of Mary Jones an 4 her friends have been exposed to the world , and the substance which was ralaQd in the flrat instance upon the wagon of sin lias Binco boon scrambled for and wasted In . litigation and confllol . —• Times .
Original Correspondence... ¦' • ' • ' ' ...
ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE . .. ¦' ' ' ' ' : ' ; . ?¦ .. ¦ ' ¦
France. (Front Our Own Correspondent.' )...
FRANCE . ( Front our own Correspondent . ' ) ¦ ' ¦'¦ . Paris , Thursday , 6 p . m . THE WAK QUESTION . , . ' The Moniteur of this morning announces , with unmistakable ostentation , that on Wednesday-r-that is to say yesterday—the screvir-ships of the line the Napoleon and the Algesiras , and . the screw-frigate L'lmpetueiise , had sailed from Toulon for Genoa . In spite of the efforts of certain parties the public look on the despatch of such a naval force to Genoa at this moment as most ominous , and confidence in the preservation of the peace of Europe grows less by degrees and terribly small . If the Government of the Emperor be really desirous of averting the horrors of war , and sincere in the various official statements that have been sent forth as to there being no ground for apprehension , why the despatch of this squadron ? People who are wishful that things should not be disturbed endeavour to convince themselves that the war-ships have been sent to do honour to the presence of Prince Napoleon , but they are answered that it is not usual for royalty or imperiality , when making friendly visits , to be accompanied by fleets and armies . When the Emperor visited Osborn , and when he went to London , he sent no ships of war into Portsmouth harbour . When he went to Stuttgard he took no troops in the train . Even when your illustrious fieM-marshal visited the Boulogne camp , he was accompanied by no more than a corporal guard—quite as much , malicious people said , as he was competent to command . There can be rip doubt that this display of French navalforce in the chief port-of the . dominions of Victor Emmanuel is in keeping With the succession of blunders that make the present Government a marvel and a byword unless war be intended , arid even then it is an imprudence . People will see in it one of a series of manoeuvres carefully combined and predetermined to provoke war , although to do so it should be necessary to have recourse to revolution . The presence of so strong a naval force in the Geonese waters will not be interpreted by the national and popular party in any other light than as an armed demonstration against Austria—the se- : quence to the posting of Piedmontese troops on the Ticino . Whatever explanation may be given diplomatically , Austria will look upon the fact as a defiance , or at least intended to be so in the eyes of Italians and of Europe . To those who know the character of the Genoese , it would be surprising if the sight of the French liners did not provoke a popular explosion , which would be the signal for lighting up universal war . And men say here , " Now mark the craft of Imperial policy . The war ships , it will be asserted , were sent on a peaceful errand . Their presence will rouse the hopes and spirits of the Italians into aggression upon Austria , from the consequences of which they will seek to be protected by Sardinia and France . Austria may thus be provoked into something which may be construed into a casus belli , and thus made to appear to be the disturber of the public peace , while France will stand forth as the defender of humanity , the protector of outraged nationalities , and so secure the neutrality of other powers . " It must be confessed that the move is an artful one ; but as it lacks honesty , we may be permitted to doubt its wisdom . At the same time the position of Austria in Italy grows more critical day by day , for at Villafranca is a Russian naval force that longs for an opportunity of doing something . A Busso-Franco-Sardinian , fleet would create serious embarrassments to Austria , and by operating in the Adriatic , would compel the abandonment of the strongest position , a nprowing of the basis of operations , and ultimate rotreat from the . Lombardo-Venetian provinces . Meanwhile , those who protend to bo in the confidence of the Government affirm that war is more remote than over , and the despatch of the French squadron is in tended to escort Prince Napoleon and his young bride back with all honour to the French territory . That this explanation will bo given to foreign courts is more than probablo ; but it is doubtful whether Italians will understand it so . They will tako it as a pledge of physical aid from Franco , and may perhaps bo led to rush upon Austria in the belief that her " holy bayonets are swarming upon the Alps . Admitting the pretext sent forth by the French Government , that the cougbt throats" of the men-of-war have not boon sent to swell the roar of buttle , but to accompany the imperial opithalamium , the imprudence of the measure will appoar all the groator . The opinion of well-informed persona ia that ^ lils display of naval force is intended to keep tip delusions among the Italians , to conciliate thoiy syrnpnthioa for the Emperor of Franco , and to disarm his Jooa by making him play the part of champion of ItaHun independence ; at the same time the marrlago is inaclo the cloak and excuse for an offensive demonstration against our ally . lmnwou , trapjkus an » > VAn . Among the industrial population of Franco war grows day by day more unpopular . With the Leg itimists ana the Orloanlsta it is the foo , and not the war , that thoy are adverse to . Thoy would much profor to boo an army ninroheu to the heights of Boulogne and tno
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Jan. 29, 1859, page 20, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse2.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_29011859/page/20/
-